The WWE article was not defending the use of steroids. The article was posted as a response to the media who have jumped all over the steroid angle. The WWE is contending that steroids did not play a role in the murder. The WWE is jumping to conclusions that it did not play a role, others are jumping to conclusions that it did.greggsand wrote:I love it. The WWE is actually trying to defend steriods. Check these gross & tacky statements from these idiots:
But the WWE said evidence gathered in the investigation indicates "deliberation, not rage."
"The wife's feet and hands were bound and she was asphyxiated, not beaten to death," said a statement posted on the company's Web site. "By the account of the authorities, there were substantial periods of time between the death of the wife and the death of the son, again suggesting deliberate thought, not rage."
Investigators found the bodies of Nancy and Daniel Benoit with Bibles placed next to them, authorities have said. "The presence of a Bible by each is also not an act of rage," said the WWE.
-----
Whether steroids played a part or not, why the hell would you come out and DEFEND roids at this moment. What's the upside???????
Was steroids an influence on what happened? Maybe, I don't really know. You can speculate just about anything.