I played offensive/defensive line in high school and also played in a live-blocking flag football league when I lived in NYC. No expert by any means, but I've been on both sides of the long drive issue.
The "tired" issue is related mostly to run blocking. The O-line knows the count and play, and they fire out. The D-line has to react and fight against that momentum. After a while, you do get worn down.
I think linemen tend to get more fatigued pass blocking for long periods of time, because there you are fighting the momentum of the D-line as they rush. Generally speaking, I think it takes more out of you to play the D-line than it does the offensive line.
OT: Todays NFL games
Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
- RallyMonkey
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:00 am
- ScoopBrady
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 7781
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 3:00 am
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
- matthewk
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 3324
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 3:00 am
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
True. However, I think that is offset by the DL rotating players while you usually have the same 5 OL in the game. This keeps the DL fresher than if you had the same 4 guys line up every play. If it's the same 11 vs. 11, then yes, the defense would get tired quicker. That's why I keep bringing up substitutions. TEs and LBs come into the mix, but the lines are mainly the DL vs. the OL.Brando70 wrote:I played offensive/defensive line in high school and also played in a live-blocking flag football league when I lived in NYC. No expert by any means, but I've been on both sides of the long drive issue.
The "tired" issue is related mostly to run blocking. The O-line knows the count and play, and they fire out. The D-line has to react and fight against that momentum. After a while, you do get worn down.
I think linemen tend to get more fatigued pass blocking for long periods of time, because there you are fighting the momentum of the D-line as they rush. Generally speaking, I think it takes more out of you to play the D-line than it does the offensive line.
For the record (listening DB?), I played linebacker, WR, and QB. I know SOME about line play, but didn't play it much due my (lack of) girth.
-Matt
- dbdynsty25
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 21616
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
But you're still getting beaten on more when you're playing defensive line. I don't remember ever getting tired playing on the O-line. I got my ass handed to me on plenty of occasions, but don't remember ever really feeling fatigued. However, when a guy keeps drive blocking your ass down the field, or you get walloped by a pulling guard you didn't see, it breaks you down in a hurry, rotation or no. Usually, as an O-lineman, you're not getting the surprise hit or getting driven around as much.matthewk wrote:True. However, I think that is offset by the DL rotating players while you usually have the same 5 OL in the game. This keeps the DL fresher than if you had the same 4 guys line up every play. If it's the same 11 vs. 11, then yes, the defense would get tired quicker. That's why I keep bringing up substitutions. TEs and LBs come into the mix, but the lines are mainly the DL vs. the OL.Brando70 wrote:I played offensive/defensive line in high school and also played in a live-blocking flag football league when I lived in NYC. No expert by any means, but I've been on both sides of the long drive issue.
The "tired" issue is related mostly to run blocking. The O-line knows the count and play, and they fire out. The D-line has to react and fight against that momentum. After a while, you do get worn down.
I think linemen tend to get more fatigued pass blocking for long periods of time, because there you are fighting the momentum of the D-line as they rush. Generally speaking, I think it takes more out of you to play the D-line than it does the offensive line.
For the record (listening DB?), I played linebacker, WR, and QB. I know SOME about line play, but didn't play it much due my (lack of) girth.
Plus the other thing to remember is that offensive linemen are usually bigger than the guys they are blocking, especially at the ends.
I don't think the Colts' TOP was that bad. The Colts lead in TOP in 7 of the 15 games started by Peyton Manning. They only ran about 5 less plays a game for the season.
I'm looking at the box scores and the drives are a little shorter time wise, but when they lost TOP big it was usually in games when they gave up over 200 yards rushing to KC or over 400 yards total offense to Jacksonville twice.
The Colts had a high powered offense and very generous defense. Colts' opponents only punted 52 times all season. 3.3 punts a game + 4.6 yards a rush + 90 QB Rating + 41.9 3rd down pct = poor defense.
The Colts may have forced a lot of turnovers, but they were also on the field a lot because they couldn't force the other team to punt. They forced 4 more turnovers than the Steelers in about 140 more plays.
I also don't buy that the Colts gave up a lot of garbage TDs. They gave up more points in the 2nd Quarter of games than in the 4th.
I'm looking at the box scores and the drives are a little shorter time wise, but when they lost TOP big it was usually in games when they gave up over 200 yards rushing to KC or over 400 yards total offense to Jacksonville twice.
The Colts had a high powered offense and very generous defense. Colts' opponents only punted 52 times all season. 3.3 punts a game + 4.6 yards a rush + 90 QB Rating + 41.9 3rd down pct = poor defense.
The Colts may have forced a lot of turnovers, but they were also on the field a lot because they couldn't force the other team to punt. They forced 4 more turnovers than the Steelers in about 140 more plays.
I also don't buy that the Colts gave up a lot of garbage TDs. They gave up more points in the 2nd Quarter of games than in the 4th.