Teal wrote:JRod wrote:Danimal wrote:
Wait, that's what you think locomotion is? That explains a lot.
Grow up, the attitude isn't needed.
Neither is the constant bitching about seemingly every stinking game that ever comes down the pipe...but you find a way to do it anyway. Seriously, JRod...is there a game on earth you actually don't find faults with?
So you've found a perfect game. I'd like to know what the name of that game is.
What exactly are we allowed to talk about Teal? Can we point out gameplay flaws. Can we say a game is good but has flaws. f*** me, it's not like I got the game for free. There's a reason why no one posts anymore, you have the criticism police, like yourself, where if you point out you don't like something they say of you criticize everything.
I didn't say NCAA was horrible. I didn't complain about the jerseys not getting dirty and that means I'm not going to by the game. I said, I thought the locomotion or whatever it's called is a gimmick. That's my opinion and I posted why. If you want to talk about it then debate on merit not making backhanded comments, which Danimal did. I have no problem if someone calls someone else's B.S. out but back it up with facts or things you see in the game.
It's like some people on this board are not able to have two opposing thoughts about a game at once. You can criticize parts of a game, you can even not like parts of a game and still like it or think it's good. Will gushing over the parts I like, make it more palatable for you and okay for me to criticize it?
You didn't really need to chime in here. Now if you are seeing something different with locomotion fine, then bring that up but don't bring up the personal s***, trying to say I only bring up the negative in games. I bring up the things that bother me. Is that allowed?
Forgot that part.
