The pic with #36 of Baltimore batting looked a bit much.dbdynsty25 wrote:HUH? Look fine to me.snaz16 wrote:Russell from SCEA is posting a batch of screenshots,that are looking goodover at OS.
http://www.operationsports.com/forums/s ... h-2-a.html
MLB: 10 The Show -- First Look
Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
God I hated going to games there. I've been showing up at my wife's office for lunch a lot more lately. Her office is on the 7th floor of the Butler Bldg and faces the new park. I can see the whole infield from her window. Looks fantastic!matthewk wrote:The new Twins stadium is enough to finally push me into a day 1 purchase. Playing as the Twins will give me a nice break from the Brewers and the NL. I could not stand playing as or against them in past games due to the dome.
[img]http://www.ideaspot.net/flags/Big_10/small/mich-sm.gif[/img][img]http://www.ideaspot.net/nfl/NFC_North/small/pack1-sm.gif[/img]
Wow, those old ballparks look gorgeous! It's kinda weird seeing them in color. I guess I never realized the seats at the Polo Grounds were red. Very cool.snaz16 wrote:Russell from SCEA is posting a batch of screenshots,that are looking goodover at OS.
http://www.operationsports.com/forums/s ... h-2-a.html
That's exciting, isn't it? I remember the winter before Jacobs Field opened, I'd walk down there on my lunch hour all the time, just to see how things were going. I remember thinking they were never going to be ready by Opening Day. I was wrong.JackDog wrote: God I hated going to games there. I've been showing up at my wife's office for lunch a lot more lately. Her office is on the 7th floor of the Butler Bldg and faces the new park. I can see the whole infield from her window. Looks fantastic!

- dbdynsty25
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 21619
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Hahaha...I thought the same thing. Had no idea what these fields "really" looked like. It's definitely weird to see them in color.lexbur wrote:Wow, those old ballparks look gorgeous! It's kinda weird seeing them in color. I guess I never realized the seats at the Polo Grounds were red. Very cool.
In the All-Star Baseball series on the PS2...weren't their old historic fields in B&W when you played in them? I seem to remember that for some reason. Maybe not.
DB: one version of All-Star baseball had played, had classic stadiums in color. Don't know which version, it may have even been N64. Able to remember the Polo Ground parkdbdynsty25 wrote:Hahaha...I thought the same thing. Had no idea what these fields "really" looked like. It's definitely weird to see them in color.lexbur wrote:Wow, those old ballparks look gorgeous! It's kinda weird seeing them in color. I guess I never realized the seats at the Polo Grounds were red. Very cool.
In the All-Star Baseball series on the PS2...weren't their old historic fields in B&W when you played in them? I seem to remember that for some reason. Maybe not.
- Slumberland
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 3574
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am
Yes it is. I went to the opening of "The Jake" in 94 with my father-in law. Tribe beat the Mariners and Joey Belle showed up at a party I attended that night. Good start to the season.......then the strike hit. Thankfully The Show has no labor strikes.lexbur wrote:That's exciting, isn't it? I remember the winter before Jacobs Field opened, I'd walk down there on my lunch hour all the time, just to see how things were going. I remember thinking they were never going to be ready by Opening Day. I was wrong.JackDog wrote: God I hated going to games there. I've been showing up at my wife's office for lunch a lot more lately. Her office is on the 7th floor of the Butler Bldg and faces the new park. I can see the whole infield from her window. Looks fantastic!
[img]http://www.ideaspot.net/flags/Big_10/small/mich-sm.gif[/img][img]http://www.ideaspot.net/nfl/NFC_North/small/pack1-sm.gif[/img]
- jLp vAkEr0
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 2821
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 3:00 am
- Location: : Bayamon, Puerto Rico
It's been a decent off season for the Twins. I'm glad they took a pass on Washburn and went after O-Dogvinny-b wrote:positive news for the Twins.
are finalizing a 1-year contract with Orlando Hudson.
[img]http://www.ideaspot.net/flags/Big_10/small/mich-sm.gif[/img][img]http://www.ideaspot.net/nfl/NFC_North/small/pack1-sm.gif[/img]
- dbdynsty25
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 21619
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
His defensive range has diminished exponentially according to the defensive range factor. From 2005 (5.84 leading league) to 2009 (4.84 middle of the pack) it has been going down each year. He clearly isn't the defensive player he used to be. Sure, he'll hit you .280 to .300 but he won't drive in runs and he won't steal bases. His value just isn't very high anymore. That's why he didn't get a multi-year deal.Diablo25 wrote:That is a great sign. The O-Dog is a hell of a clubhouse guy and a gold glove caliber 2B. It puzzles me why no team has given him a multi year deal.vinny-b wrote:positive news for the Twins.
are finalizing a 1-year contract with Orlando Hudson.
Spot on Scott. That being said he's an improvement over the 4 Million dollar man Punto. The jury is still out on Alexi Casilla so hopefully this one year deal works out. I hear they might move Casilla. I hope that's not the case. When I get The Show I'm going to do a Reds and Twins franchise. First person I'm cutting is Punto and Dom is starting at 3bdbdynsty25 wrote:His defensive range has diminished exponentially according to the defensive range factor. From 2005 (5.84 leading league) to 2009 (4.84 middle of the pack) it has been going down each year. He clearly isn't the defensive player he used to be. Sure, he'll hit you .280 to .300 but he won't drive in runs and he won't steal bases. His value just isn't very high anymore. That's why he didn't get a multi-year deal.Diablo25 wrote:That is a great sign. The O-Dog is a hell of a clubhouse guy and a gold glove caliber 2B. It puzzles me why no team has given him a multi year deal.vinny-b wrote:positive news for the Twins.
are finalizing a 1-year contract with Orlando Hudson.

[img]http://www.ideaspot.net/flags/Big_10/small/mich-sm.gif[/img][img]http://www.ideaspot.net/nfl/NFC_North/small/pack1-sm.gif[/img]
He has enough value for a multi. He has never been a big threat on the bases. Yes his range has diminished but he can still pick it. His offense is still solid and he is a great clubhouse presence. You can't tell me he's not worth at least a 2 year deal with some team.dbdynsty25 wrote:His defensive range has diminished exponentially according to the defensive range factor. From 2005 (5.84 leading league) to 2009 (4.84 middle of the pack) it has been going down each year. He clearly isn't the defensive player he used to be. Sure, he'll hit you .280 to .300 but he won't drive in runs and he won't steal bases. His value just isn't very high anymore. That's why he didn't get a multi-year deal.Diablo25 wrote:That is a great sign. The O-Dog is a hell of a clubhouse guy and a gold glove caliber 2B. It puzzles me why no team has given him a multi year deal.vinny-b wrote:positive news for the Twins.
are finalizing a 1-year contract with Orlando Hudson.
XBLive Gamertag - Diablo25
PSN Name - EPDiablo25
PSN Name - EPDiablo25
- dbdynsty25
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 21619
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Touche' I guess I should have stated it as IMO, he is worth a multi year contract. My point is that there are several 2B out there that are not as solid a player and presence in the clubhouse that have gotten better deals.dbdynsty25 wrote:Umm...I can do exactly that, and there are 30 MLB GMs that obviously agree with me.Diablo25 wrote:You can't tell me he's not worth at least a 2 year deal with some team.
XBLive Gamertag - Diablo25
PSN Name - EPDiablo25
PSN Name - EPDiablo25
Zlax45 wrote:http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/27864
viewing this video, i notice no meaningful differences between this and an actual game.

Damn this game keeps getter better and better. Btw i'm in the minority, I haven't tired of the commentary yet. Vandy still sounds great albeit more low key than Gary Thorne.