Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
kevinpars wrote:George W. Bush gave more terrorists a free ride back to Saudi Arabia on 09/12/2001 than Obama could befriend if he lived to be 100 - and Bush did it with our tax dollars as we sat in our houses and prayed for those who died in the terrorist attacks.
Seven plus years, two wars, thousands of American lives and billions of American dollars later and the chief architect of those attacks is still alive and breathing. Probably laughing his ass off as the stock market drops below 9000.
I guess i am just like W (the president) and see things in black and white: The man who planned the attacks is still alive and his family continues to print money out of oil. American's cut back while the Saudi's buy H2's with pocket change for their teenage sons.
You want a war hero in DC? We had one in Max Cleland. But the Rebublicans thought Saxby Chambliss (who sat out Vietnam with a football injury) was a better choice and swift boated the war hero in the wheelchair. And Chambliss paid Bush pack by rubber stamping everything Bush wanted - including the bailout.
But the massive debt and financial crisis is all Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi's fault, right guys?
So I guess you're not voting for W this year? Shame. I really thought he had a chance for another term until you cunningly brought all that up.kevinpars wrote:George W. Bush gave more terrorists a free ride back to Saudi Arabia on 09/12/2001 than Obama could befriend if he lived to be 100 - and Bush did it with our tax dollars as we sat in our houses and prayed for those who died in the terrorist attacks.
Seven plus years, two wars, thousands of American lives and billions of American dollars later and the chief architect of those attacks is still alive and breathing. Probably laughing his ass off as the stock market drops below 9000.
I guess i am just like W (the president) and see things in black and white: The man who planned the attacks is still alive and his family continues to print money out of oil. American's cut back while the Saudi's buy H2's with pocket change for their teenage sons.
You want a war hero in DC? We had one in Max Cleland. But the Rebublicans thought Saxby Chambliss (who sat out Vietnam with a football injury) was a better choice and swift boated the war hero in the wheelchair. And Chambliss paid Bush pack by rubber stamping everything Bush wanted - including the bailout.
But the massive debt and financial crisis is all Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi's fault, right guys?
The city of Philadelphia is mostly Democrat, but I'd guess based on the demographics at the games I've attended in Philly that the majority of Flyers fans are coming from the more politically diverse white suburbs. However, I wasn't surprised by the boos and probably would have booed too just for "fun" (maybe I have a little Philly in me as a Sixers fan).JackB1 wrote:Nah...I dumped the 6000 for the 9900 a long time ago.XXXIV wrote:
Whats wrong with you?
Dont you know he owns an Applause Meter 6000?
Seriously, isn't Philly predominantly Democratic? The party was founded there, wasn't it? Isn't that what you would expect?
While I've never been to her blog before, anyone who's inclined to check out MM's entry today can find plenty of evidence apropos of your statement:RobVarak wrote:It's quite remarkable how sensitive the Left has gotten about this sort of thing despite basking in 8 years of assassination fantasies about Bush & Cheney. Touching, really.Feanor wrote: At least no one in the crowd suggested she should be killed.
The party of tolerance?GameSeven wrote: While I've never been to her blog before, anyone who's inclined to check out MM's entry today can find plenty of evidence apropos of your statement:
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/12/cr ... sane-rage/
We are NOT allowing personal attacks on specific posters. If there is one rule I've tried to have, it's this one. So, starting now, here's the following rule:Feanor wrote:Cause the media never reports when Philly crowds do something awful?
Ah, I see. First, Bush sent the real terrorists home, then he unjustly locked up a bunch of fake ones at Gitmo. Except the first group wasn't ACTUALLY real terrorists, they were just fall guys for the Bush Admin's inside job on 9/11.GTHobbes wrote:Good post, Kevin.kevinpars wrote:George W. Bush gave more terrorists a free ride back to Saudi Arabia on 09/12/2001 than Obama could befriend if he lived to be 100 - and Bush did it with our tax dollars as we sat in our houses and prayed for those who died in the terrorist attacks.
Close...Very close but no cigar. Bush was the lead terrorist.FatPitcher wrote:
Ah, I see. First, Bush sent the real terrorists home, then he unjustly locked up a bunch of fake ones at Gitmo. Except the first group wasn't ACTUALLY real terrorists, they were just fall guys for the Bush Admin's inside job on 9/11.
.
Guys. Instead of mocking, please tell me what exactly isn't true here?kevinpars wrote:George W. Bush gave more terrorists a free ride back to Saudi Arabia on 09/12/2001 than Obama could befriend if he lived to be 100 - and Bush did it with our tax dollars as we sat in our houses and prayed for those who died in the terrorist attacks.
Seven plus years, two wars, thousands of American lives and billions of American dollars later and the chief architect of those attacks is still alive and breathing. Probably laughing his ass off as the stock market drops below 9000.
I guess i am just like W (the president) and see things in black and white: The man who planned the attacks is still alive and his family continues to print money out of oil. American's cut back while the Saudi's buy H2's with pocket change for their teenage sons.
You want a war hero in DC? We had one in Max Cleland. But the Rebublicans thought Saxby Chambliss (who sat out Vietnam with a football injury) was a better choice and swift boated the war hero in the wheelchair. And Chambliss paid Bush pack by rubber stamping everything Bush wanted - including the bailout.
But the massive debt and financial crisis is all Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi's fault, right guys?
There doesn't need to be. The effects of that 9/11 attack continues to reverberate to this day. And let me remind you who's watch the 9/11 attacks came under, since you seem to have forgotten....He's the same guy you are crediting for "protecting" us since then. Bin Laden doesn't need to do anything more. He is laughing at us while we self destruct and nothing makes me sicker to my stomach. We have been our own worst enemy. Once we correct that problem, then maybe we can focus on our enemies.XXXIV wrote:
What I know...KNOW FOR A FACT is that there hasnt been a terrorist attack here since that day.
Actually Bill Clinton warned Congress about Freddie and Fanny. Maxine Waters on the other hand,not so much. Man,she really needs to remember her lies. Stephen Moore owned her on Real Time friday night.kevinpars wrote: But the massive debt and financial crisis is all Bill Clinton and Nancy Pelosi's fault, right guys?
Nancy and Harry need a vacation at Rangel's tax free Dominican Villa.NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll conducted by the polling organizations of Peter Hart (D) and Neil Newhouse (R). June 6-9, 2008. N=approx. 500 registered voters nationwide.
RV = registered voters. Except where noted, results below are among all adults.
6/6-9/08 RV
Approve 13%
Disapprove 79%
Unsure 8%
This is the lowest approval for Congress in this poll dating back to 1997. When the Repubs were the majority in Congress, the job approval only went below 20% once, in October of 2006. But since the kids took over, the highest they’ve been able to muster is a 31%, and that was about a month after they took over in early 2007. The last 5 polls have all been below 20%.
Look, if you're going to keep looking backward, at least get some 20/20 lenses to see through. There doesn't need to be?!? What kind of sentiment is that? Who's 'watch' 9/11 happened on? Bill Clinton lamented that it didn't happen on his-he wanted the legacy! The 1990's were a complete setup to 9/11, and, outside of kool aid drinking, there's no real reason to think differently.JackB1 wrote:There doesn't need to be. The effects of that 9/11 attack continues to reverberate to this day. And let me remind you who's watch the 9/11 attacks came under, since you seem to have forgotten....He's the same guy you are crediting for "protecting" us since then.XXXIV wrote:
What I know...KNOW FOR A FACT is that there hasnt been a terrorist attack here since that day.
He even suggests that maybe McCain should run a positive campaign! What a concept that would be, might as well try everything during the last couple of months.The Obama team is well organized, flush with resources, and the candidate and the campaign are in sync. The McCain campaign, once merely problematic, is now close to being out-and-out dysfunctional. Its combination of strategic incoherence and operational incompetence has become toxic. If the race continues over the next three weeks to be a conventional one, McCain is doomed.
Neither candidate has been successful in the general election season by being positive, and anyone who tries to be positive is ridiculed for being out of touch with the decidedly negative circumstances and mood of the voters.TheHiddenTrack wrote: He even suggests that maybe McCain should run a positive campaign! What a concept that would be, might as well try everything during the last couple of months.
Also quite ironic considering how they seem to be fine with guys like Ayers and Wright. Ayers' actions actually resulted in the deaths of innocent people, but he seems to be an ok guyRobVarak wrote:It's quite remarkable how sensitive the Left has gotten about this sort of thing despite basking in 8 years of assassination fantasies about Bush & Cheney. Touching, really.Feanor wrote:At least no one in the crowd suggested she should be killed.FatPitcher wrote: Looks like you were in the minority on that. Or maybe they were booing her daughter, who knows.
Maybe you need to be reminded of when the towers were first attacked. They tried to take them down way back in 1993. Who was the president then, and why didn't he get all the terrorists back then?JackB1 wrote:There doesn't need to be. The effects of that 9/11 attack continues to reverberate to this day. And let me remind you who's watch the 9/11 attacks came under, since you seem to have forgotten....He's the same guy you are crediting for "protecting" us since then. Bin Laden doesn't need to do anything more. He is laughing at us while we self destruct and nothing makes me sicker to my stomach. We have been our own worst enemy. Once we correct that problem, then maybe we can focus on our enemies.XXXIV wrote:
What I know...KNOW FOR A FACT is that there hasnt been a terrorist attack here since that day.
What is not true is that they were terrorists.JackB1 wrote:Guys. Instead of mocking, please tell me what exactly isn't true here?kevinpars wrote:George W. Bush gave more terrorists a free ride back to Saudi Arabia on 09/12/2001 than Obama could befriend if he lived to be 100 - and Bush did it with our tax dollars as we sat in our houses and prayed for those who died in the terrorist attacks.
Point #1) Bush gave all of Bin Laden's family members a free ride out of the country after 9/11. What's not true? This is documented fact.
