Inuyasha wrote:
It's almost like if MJ in 1988 did something stupid like this. That would have wiped away a decade of basketball with MJ being the icon of not just the NBA but professional sports. This is sort of on the same level.
Wow. I think that's a bit of a stretch. Vick was an exciting player to watch, but he's not the best NFL player ever. MJ is the best player in NBA history (or at least that can be debated). Vick was a decent QB, but even before the injuries when he was at his peak, he wasn't considered the best QB in the NFL at the time, much less the best ever like a MJ is to basketball.
The NBA is a team sport, but it's very much an individual sport as well. The NFL is complete different that way, in that people tend to root for the jersey, not the guy in the jersey. Names change on the jersey, players come and go, and only the truely great one's are remembered (and Vick was not, nor was he going to be).
Look at Jerry Rice, probably the best WR ever and one of the best players of all time. If he did something like Vick did when he was an icon with the Niner's, yes it would have been a huge deal but the Niner's would still have been a great team, probably would have won many championships and the NFL would have been as popular as ever.
If MJ does something like that, then yes, the NBA loses an icon for an entire decade, the face of the NBA, and the Bulls don't win those multiple championships.
The NFL will be just fine w/o Michael Vick.