OT: Tide finally turning on eminent domain

Welcome to the Digital Sportspage forum.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady

Post Reply
Jayhawker
Starting 5
Starting 5
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:00 am

OT: Tide finally turning on eminent domain

Post by Jayhawker »

From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch 11/1/05:
A little more than a month ago, St. Louis voters removed Alderman Thomas Bauer in a recall election fueled by his support for the use of eminent domain. Bauer supported using the law to clear the way for a gas station near the corner of Manchester and McCausland avenues.

Worried about the potential backlash, Creve Coeur officials recently voted to delay authorizing eminent domain for a project on Olive Boulevard.
Then today CNN is reporting:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Contending that the Supreme Court has undermined a pillar of American society -- the sanctity of the home -- the House overwhelmingly approved a bill Thursday to block the court-approved seizure of private property for use by developers.

The bill, passed 376-38, would withhold federal money from state and local governments that use powers of eminent domain to force businesses and homeowners to give up their property for commercial uses.
Looks like reason is finally taking hold. Even if this was technically constitutional, it is clear that this is one issue the country could actually support an amendment over.

I meant to post something awhile back when I starting seeing the recall signs for Tom Bauer. In the end, democracy still works.
Inuyasha
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4638
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 3:00 am

Post by Inuyasha »

That's good news. At least they all don't have their heads up their you know where down in DC.
User avatar
wco81
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 9575
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 3:00 am
Location: San Jose

Post by wco81 »

Inuyasha wrote:That's good news. At least they all don't have their heads up their you know where down in DC.
I wouldn't bet on that.

Even if the Court's decision is wrong, at least the Justices are less likely to be swayed by lobbyists and campaign contributions.

The Court is certainly not infallible but at least it's not wide open to political or monetary influence.
Post Reply