I'm back....

Teal · Post by **Teal** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:21 pm

You forgot RiddleMan...so it's:

SuperiorCommonParkerRiddleSense

Oops...my bad. I stand corrected.

K_Mosley · Post by **K_Mosley** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:46 pm

You also forgot "neuwave."

http://www.digitalsportspage.com/module ... ight=yakyu

So, it's SuperiorCommonParkerRiddleSenseNeuwave!

Kevin

pk500 · Post by **pk500** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:46 pm

Parker needs attention like humans need oxygen. It's the only reason he posted here again -- he was lacking oxygen from other forums.

So the best thing for everyone to do is ignore him, don't respond to any of his posts, and suffocate him as the waste of bandwidth that he is.

If there's a 0 in the replies column of every post he starts and no one responds directly to one of his replies in posts not started by him, he will feel neglected and go away. It's the reason why he never trolled here that often during the time he honored his bet. He wasn't getting the attention he so craved, so he bolted.

Trolls need oxygen. I find it hard to believe that the collective discipline of this place can't snuff his air supply.

Simple enough.

Take care,
PK

Teal · Post by **Teal** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:22 pm

pk500 wrote:Parker needs attention like humans need oxygen.

...like those big green flies need buffalo chips...

Post by **Jared** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:39 pm

Parker wrote:"Instead of just saying "yeah, that's right", you then say you're talking about the attitude of the people."

Because I was. I guess I'm a bit more analytical than the tv viewer who does nothing more than count the number of fans in the stands.

More analytical, eh? So you've done a study on the attitude of the West Coast fan, eh? Something scientific maybe, with a sound methodology perhaps? Maybe a study on fan attendance by inning in all of the major league ballparks?

This is a prime example as to why people don't like you. Your posts ooze with an unfounded arrogance that is completely unnecessary. Someone brings out data to back up a claim, and you bring it back at them with a snide comment about how you're "a bit more analytical" than a person that would bring this up. (And don't try and squirm out of this by saying you were referring to the "tv viewer" in general, and not BKrich in his response.)

That, combined with your desire to squirm out of what you say really bothers people.

I am the same Parker I was before. You didn't ban me then, but I guess you have changed.

My bullshit tolerance has decreased. I spend too much time keeping this site running as it is, and I don't want the forums ruined by someone who likes to play forum attention whore. Quite frankly, it's not worth my time.

But regardless, I haven't banned you yet. I probably should have banned you when you first came to the forums considering your horrific history at SR. But my policy was (and still is) that I won't ban someone based on things at other forums.

However, I can and will ban for whatever reason I want. And when I have to spend time dealing with problems on here that are directly related to you instead of doing other things, it annoys me. Fortunately I've been very kind and haven't banned you, and I'm still holding back from it right now to give you a chance. But you're on extremely thin ice. You're going to have to learn to not be such a pain in everyone's backside if you want to stay. Otherwise, you're gone.

If you have any questions, comments, etc., feel free to PM me or post here.

bdoughty · Post by **bdoughty** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:36 am

[sigh]Niagara over Oklahoma?

Yea I bet alot of thought and analysis went into that pick. Same ol Parker. [/sigh]

Leave the Drama to TNT because as they say...

Parker · Post by **Parker** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:36 am

dbdynsty25 wrote:
tealboy03 wrote:Really? Well then by all means...don't let the doorknob hit you on the way out, SuperiorCommonParkerSense...
You forgot RiddleMan...so it's:

SuperiorCommonParkerRiddleSense

As I've said before, the only other person I have been that you would have known, was Resin. No one else.

Parker · Post by **Parker** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:39 am

"More analytical, eh? So you've done a study on the attitude of the West Coast fan, eh? Something scientific maybe, with a sound methodology perhaps? Maybe a study on fan attendance by inning in all of the major league ballparks?"

There is plenty more you can casually observe besides how many people there are. Much of it having to do with how fans react to events during a game. Or how loud they are. Is that so hard to understand?

Post by **Jared** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:22 pm

Parker wrote:"More analytical, eh? So you've done a study on the attitude of the West Coast fan, eh? Something scientific maybe, with a sound methodology perhaps? Maybe a study on fan attendance by inning in all of the major league ballparks?"

There is plenty more you can casually observe besides how many people there are. Much of it having to do with how fans react to events during a game. Or how loud they are. Is that so hard to understand?

The point here is that you have NO basis to say that you're more analytical than Bkrich or anyone else. Evidence/analyses for that would be something like pulling out some study on West Coast attitudes or fan attendance by inning or something. Furthermore, casual observation is NOT analysis. If you want to get truly analytical about this, observation of how fans react watching games would be classified as anecdotal evidence, which is definitely NOT analysis and is in no way analytical. If you're going to say you're "more analytical", you can't back it up with anecdotal evidence.

But back to the general point. The arrogance in posts like these causes discord. I don't like discord on my forums. So I reserve the right to kick you out of my forums if I want. I've been MORE than fair to you during your time at DSP and have defended you when no one else has. What I'm asking is that you learn how to exist on the forums without the arrogance, argument squirming, etc. that has marked your posting history. Otherwise, you're gone.

Post by **ScoopBrady** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:25 pm

Save yourself the headache Jared and just boot him now. He's arguing the same points you laid out in the same way you laid them out with you right now. Rather than saying "Hey, you're right. I'll work on it.", he's trying to stir the pot some more. It's like he gets off on it.

dougb · Post by **dougb** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:34 pm

84 posts in two days...my god!

OTH, the antidote to most threads seems to be a post by me. I mean, look how many threads have petered out after I've posted in them. Oh sure, sometimes they sputter on for a few more posts afterwards but I'm usually the kiss of death for any thread. Just not entertaining enough...

best wishes,

Doug

HouOilers · Post by **HouOilers** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:52 pm

saw this thread yesterday and ignored it . just logged in and it's gone 5 pages! I still dont know what all the hub-bub is about.

DivotMaker · Post by **DivotMaker** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:12 pm

Parker wrote: As I've said before, the only other person I have been that you would have known, was Resin. No one else.

I remember flame after flame that you threw at me consistently as "Resin" at SR....out of respect for Jared and the rest of the DSP users, I won't go into detail as to what I really think of you and the utter BS you pulled there....needless to say, I won't be wasting any more of my time responding to you. I think a fence post would be a much better choice to try to have a rational discussion with than the nonsense you pull in virtually every response.

Brando70 · Post by **Brando70** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:29 pm

bdoughty wrote:[sigh]Niagara over Oklahoma?

Yea I bet alot of thought and analysis went into that pick. Same ol Parker. [/sigh]

Leave the Drama to TNT because as they say...

I made that same "prediction," but only because the money line was +700. Oh well, it was a fun half.

Parker · Post by **Parker** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 pm

Damnt my bracket was looking much better than yesterday until Fatnamara and Dionne Warwick screwed it up.

dbdynsty25 · Post by **dbdynsty25** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:20 pm

I thought you knew all? You should have been able to predict that.

Parker · Post by **Parker** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:24 pm

Well, I didn't predict cuse going very far. But it's looking good for my final 4 to come true.

Sully · Post by **Sully** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:27 pm

Parker wrote:Well, I didn't predict cuse going very far. But it's looking good for my final 4 to come true.

Wow, the first round isn't even finished, yet it's looking like your Final Four will come true?

fletcher21 · Post by **fletcher21** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:30 pm

its good to have you back parker, you remind me a lot of myself, only i doubt you get any women and i think you may be a middle aged man lol

Parker · Post by **Parker** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:31 pm

If BC can beat Illinois, I'm very confident those will be the final 4 teams. Obviously, that won't be easy, but it will happen.

fletcher21 · Post by **fletcher21** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:17 pm

parker whats up man where in ma do you live? anywhere near canton ?

Parker · Post by **Parker** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:39 pm

I live in Boston.

fletcher21 · Post by **fletcher21** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:50 pm

cool man, next time in in ma i should come over and we can go out and take pics for a little dsp story... i am sure EVERYONE would love to see pisc from a nite out in the life of parker... i know i would lol

F308GTB · Post by **F308GTB** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:50 pm

Parker wrote:My bracket is in trouble already. So much for Bama being the one to stop BC.

Real trouble now eh?

Post by **ScoopBrady** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:52 pm

Now will you leave Mr. Iknowmoreaboutcollegebasketballthananyonehere?