I dont think you get a draft pick when you get relegated to the second division.MizzouRah wrote:So which QB are the Rams taking in the draft.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
good one. If I was playing madden & that happened to me, I wouldn't 'save' my game & play it over again thinking "there's no waaay". rough...XXXIV wrote:
35-0![]()
![]()
... Niners get 3 TDs directly on turnovers as one INT and 2 fumbles are returned for TDs. The offense was -21. I think its a bug. It has to be a bug. Im waiting for the NFL to release a patch.
So will say they are legit.Brando70 wrote:
The Broncos are officially legit, especially their defense. That team looked like a disaster in the making before the season started, but kudos to McDaniels for toughening them up.
I especially don't get it because the one thing their receiving corps has is speed. It seems like if they threatened to go deep more, it would open up the running game, and if teams still stacked against the run, they could throw deep. Maybe Ron Turner needs to play a Bears franchise in Madden so he can see what this offense could do.RobVarak wrote:Brando,
You're not getting the benefit of the awesome power of a fully operational meatball Bears fan electorate. The Bears could average 350yds and 35pts per game, but if they don't rush for 200 while wearing leather helmets a vocal minority of morons will castigate the team for not doing it the Staley way.
Turner at heart is still a classic West Coast guy. He only likes to go deep on play action, and most of his plays are traditional catch-and-run routes. Between the Bears and Illinois I've watched him far too much. I think a lot of the lack of a vertical game has also come from the fact that Cutler's had to check down for lack of time. The OL has been ok, better than I expected actually; But they're still not solid enough to buy Cutler a lot of time to explore those few deeper routes that he does have.Brando70 wrote:I especially don't get it because the one thing their receiving corps has is speed. It seems like if they threatened to go deep more, it would open up the running game, and if teams still stacked against the run, they could throw deep. Maybe Ron Turner needs to play a Bears franchise in Madden so he can see what this offense could do.RobVarak wrote:Brando,
You're not getting the benefit of the awesome power of a fully operational meatball Bears fan electorate. The Bears could average 350yds and 35pts per game, but if they don't rush for 200 while wearing leather helmets a vocal minority of morons will castigate the team for not doing it the Staley way.![]()
I do like the aggressiveness of the defense. Their blitzes still get picked up too much, but they're getting good pressure with the front four most of the time.
No doubt they would be SB contenders with Cutler, but they are a legitimate team. Orton is not going to beat teams with his arm, but he's thrown no picks in four games. He's a good game manager, and he's a good choice for a team like Denver that can run the ball well.JRod wrote:So will say they are legit.
A lucky win against Cincy. Then wins against the Browns and Raiders. They should have lost against Cincy and the Browns and Raiders are terrible. The Cowboys have all sorts of problems and should have won this game. Maybe it was injuries or coaching but they dominated the Broncos until Barber went out. Broncos didn't so much win it as the Cowboys never could put it away. And when you leave teams around the NFL, they'll eventually hurt you.
Orton might be able to manage are way to the playoffs but as Bears fans saw he'll crumble eventually.
Nnow could you imagine this team with this defense and Cutler? Probably not as close of games and the Broncos had.
Contender...Brando70 wrote:No doubt they would be SB contenders with Cutler, but they are a legitimate team. Orton is not going to beat teams with his arm, but he's thrown no picks in four games. He's a good game manager, and he's a good choice for a team like Denver that can run the ball well.JRod wrote:So will say they are legit.
A lucky win against Cincy. Then wins against the Browns and Raiders. They should have lost against Cincy and the Browns and Raiders are terrible. The Cowboys have all sorts of problems and should have won this game. Maybe it was injuries or coaching but they dominated the Broncos until Barber went out. Broncos didn't so much win it as the Cowboys never could put it away. And when you leave teams around the NFL, they'll eventually hurt you.
Orton might be able to manage are way to the playoffs but as Bears fans saw he'll crumble eventually.
Nnow could you imagine this team with this defense and Cutler? Probably not as close of games and the Broncos had.
The Denver defense stepped up against a Dallas team that has been running on everyone. I think Romo is starting to show why he was undrafted. Even then, Dallas is still a pretty dangerous offensive team, and the Broncos kept them in check most of the game. Regardless of who they have played, they've given up 26 points in four games. The next closest team is San Fran at 53.
It's early and they've got a tough stretch coming up, so things could go south. But given the horrendous offseason they've had, I'm impressed with how they've come out of the gate. Confidence goes a long way in the NFL and they have to feel good after shutting Dallas down.
Look, I could care less about the Broncos. But I don't see how you can't give credit to Denver for winning that game. Their defense played really well. They shut down a tough Dallas running game, made a key pick against Romo, and had five sacks. Dallas did have a big yardage advantage in the first half, which would be meaningful if football games lasted only one half.JRod wrote:The Cowboys wins was more of loss by the Cowboys than a win by the Broncos.
I kind of agree. But in all the credit being given to Marshall, people seem to be overlooking the shockingly bad tackling on that last play. Awful!Brando70 wrote:Look, I could care less about the Broncos. But I don't see how you can't give credit to Denver for winning that game.JRod wrote:The Cowboys wins was more of loss by the Cowboys than a win by the Broncos.
Alex Van Pelt.dbdynsty25 wrote:Why is Scott Van Pelt Buffalo's OC again? He's got experience in NFL Europe at least.
Someone on Deadspin caught Zeppo in his Redskins-game uniform.Brando70 wrote:
I think I would have rather swallowed my tongue than watched the Skins and Bucs. I don't know how you did it, Zeppo.
Alex, Scott, whatever. LOL.pk500 wrote:Regarding the offense, Van Pelt and/or Jauron don't trust Edwards to throw the ball downfield. My knee-jerk reaction is to say I can't blame them, as Edwards' arm strength isn't great.
He's absolutely right. One of the many reasons it's a good thing I'm bald. Otherwise, there were be clumps of hair in my basement every Sunday that I pulled out watching Edwards play.dbdynsty25 wrote:My buddy literally went nuts...he says they do that all the time.
Looks like the Dolphins guessed right with Henne. I'm feeling a lot better after watching him play yesterday. He was poised for his first NFL start and made very few mistakes. Nice pick six by Vonte, that dude can play although he did some rookie mistakes which was to be expected. Three sacks for Cameron Wake, sweet.dbdynsty25 wrote:
I feel your pain man. The Dolphins have been fine this year, they've just been unlucky on the scoreboard. Unlike two years ago when they looked like the Bills do now. Literally having no idea what to do on offense and getting gouged regularly on D.
I told you he'd be alright. Thought it was just against the Bills. If he does the same thing next Monday night against the Jets and their D, then I'll be more confident. He didn't make any terribly difficult throws yesterday except for maybe the TD to Hartline...that was pretty nice.Rodster wrote:Looks like the Dolphins guessed right with Henne.
The AFC West is the worst division in the league.Brando70 wrote:Look, I could care less about the Broncos. But I don't see how you can't give credit to Denver for winning that game. Their defense played really well. They shut down a tough Dallas running game, made a key pick against Romo, and had five sacks. Dallas did have a big yardage advantage in the first half, which would be meaningful if football games lasted only one half.JRod wrote:The Cowboys wins was more of loss by the Cowboys than a win by the Broncos.
They are probably going to fall to earth somewhat given their schedule. However, they look considerably better than the Chargers, who have an atrocious defense this year, and I think Denver's got a pretty good chance of winning the AFC West. The next game against the Pats should indicate how they stack up against other elite AFC teams.