OT: 2008 Elections/Politics thread, Part 2

Welcome to the Digital Sportspage forum.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady

Locked
User avatar
Slumberland
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3574
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am

Post by Slumberland »

JackB1 wrote:One of the major flaws with our system: One Party President + Other Party in Congress = Not Much Getting Done.
I hate to respond to one of your posts after going so beyond the pale earlier that you clearly don't even know where the pale is, but many people would describe that as a positive, not a flaw.
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

pk500 wrote:
I really like the man; I don't like or trust his party one bit. And unfortunately they're a package deal in American politics, "maverick candidate" or not.

Take care,
PK
I agree 100%. Like the man...don't trust the party. There are rumors he was pressured into taking Palin as VP to pacify the hard right side of the party and to win over the evangelical vote that helped to elect Bush in the past. Not sure how much "maverick" is left in him these days?
User avatar
Teal
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8620
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am

Post by Teal »

JackB1 wrote:
pk500 wrote:
I really like the man; I don't like or trust his party one bit. And unfortunately they're a package deal in American politics, "maverick candidate" or not.

Take care,
PK
I agree 100%. Like the man...don't trust the party. There are rumors he was pressured into taking Palin as VP to pacify the hard right side of the party and to win over the evangelical vote that helped to elect Bush in the past. Not sure how much "maverick" is left in him these days?
Haven't we had quite enough 'rumors' from the Left and the media about Palin in the last few days? Rumors are started by dumbshits who just want something to stick, whether it's true or not. People will say anything.
Last edited by Teal on Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
www.trailheadoutfitters.org
trailheadoutfitters.wordpress.com
facebook.com/Intentional.Fatherhood
User avatar
Slumberland
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3574
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:00 am

Post by Slumberland »

RobVarak wrote:That's not to say that it isn't entirely fair and appropriate for McCain and the GOP to criticize Obama's lack of judgment on the surge. Of course suggesting that Obama lacks the proper judgment to lead is also "character assasination." :roll:
It's 100% legit and McCain has the right to sing it from the rooftops.

This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008 ... _were.html
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

Teal wrote:
Haven't we had quite enough 'rumors' from the Left about Palin in the last few days? Rumors are started by dumbshits who just want something to stick, whether it's true or not. People will say anything.
Kinda like the Obama is a Muslim rumour? :wink:
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

JackB1 wrote:
Teal wrote:
Haven't we had quite enough 'rumors' from the Left about Palin in the last few days? Rumors are started by dumbshits who just want something to stick, whether it's true or not. People will say anything.
Kinda like the Obama is a Muslim rumour? :wink:
He's not? :P
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

Slumberland wrote:
JackB1 wrote:One of the major flaws with our system: One Party President + Other Party in Congress = Not Much Getting Done.
I hate to respond to one of your posts after going so beyond the pale earlier that you clearly don't even know where the pale is, but many people would describe that as a positive, not a flaw.
How is it a positive when Congress sits on their hands for 2 years?
User avatar
RobVarak
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8684
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Naperville, IL

Post by RobVarak »

Slumberland wrote: This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008 ... _were.html
They won't be able to keep that policy in place for long. The dogs will be baying far too loudly, and it's a stupid policy. If anything it's probably just a holding tactic to get her prepped.

On a related note, the McCain campaign is being done no favors by its mouthpieces. They're running a distinctly junior varsity team out there. I don't know if too much of the GOP talent coalesced around the other primary candidates or what, but they need to get that straightened out...yesterday.
XBL Gamertag: RobVarak

"Ok I'm an elitist, but I have a healthy respect for people who don't measure up." --Aaron Sorkin
User avatar
wco81
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 9575
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 3:00 am
Location: San Jose

Post by wco81 »

RobVarak wrote:I've never once heard McCain suggest that Obama would sacrifice the war for his own ambition.

On July 22, 2008, McCain was quoted as saying the following:
"It seems to me that Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign."
http://www.time.com/time/politics/artic ... 64,00.html


[/quote]
User avatar
Jared
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jared »

Teal wrote:
JackB1 wrote: I agree 100%. Like the man...don't trust the party. There are rumors he was pressured into taking Palin as VP to pacify the hard right side of the party and to win over the evangelical vote that helped to elect Bush in the past. Not sure how much "maverick" is left in him these days?
Haven't we had quite enough 'rumors' from the Left about Palin in the last few days? Rumors are started by dumbshits who just want something to stick, whether it's true or not. People will say anything.
This has been reported on from multiple sources, and (I don't think) denied by the McCain camp. An example...

Link
For weeks, advisers close to the campaign said, Mr. McCain had wanted to name as his running mate his good friend Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, the Democrat turned independent. But by the end of last weekend, the outrage from Christian conservatives over the possibility that Mr. McCain would fill out the Republican ticket with Mr. Lieberman, a supporter of abortion rights, had become too intense to be ignored.

With time running out, and after a long meeting with his inner circle in Phoenix, Mr. McCain finally picked up the phone last Sunday and reached Ms. Palin at the Alaska State Fair. Although the campaign’s polling on Mr. McCain’s potential running mates was inconclusive on the selection of Ms. Palin — virtually no one had heard of her, a McCain adviser said — the governor, who opposes abortion, had glowing reviews from influential social conservatives.
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

Slumberland wrote:
This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008 ... _were.html
What is Palin going to do when confronted with world leaders that are a lot more unfriendly than the press or our own media?
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

Slumberland wrote:This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.
Here is an idea for the media...Instead of treating her like a hollywood ho on an Enquirer cover or as the second coming of Mother Theresa. Treat her like they do Biden.
User avatar
Teal
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8620
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am

Post by Teal »

Palin was a much better pick, anyway. I love Joe Lieberman. But he'd have divided the party tremendously.
www.trailheadoutfitters.org
trailheadoutfitters.wordpress.com
facebook.com/Intentional.Fatherhood
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

JackB1 wrote:
Slumberland wrote:
This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008 ... _were.html
What is Palin going to do when confronted with world leaders that are a lot more unfriendly than the press or our own media?
Probably what she always does.
User avatar
webdanzer
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4795
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2003 4:00 am
Location: New Jersey

Post by webdanzer »

Jared wrote:
Teal wrote:
JackB1 wrote: I agree 100%. Like the man...don't trust the party. There are rumors he was pressured into taking Palin as VP to pacify the hard right side of the party and to win over the evangelical vote that helped to elect Bush in the past. Not sure how much "maverick" is left in him these days?
Haven't we had quite enough 'rumors' from the Left about Palin in the last few days? Rumors are started by dumbshits who just want something to stick, whether it's true or not. People will say anything.
This has been reported on from multiple sources, and (I don't think) denied by the McCain camp. An example...

Link
For weeks, advisers close to the campaign said, Mr. McCain had wanted to name as his running mate his good friend Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, the Democrat turned independent. But by the end of last weekend, the outrage from Christian conservatives over the possibility that Mr. McCain would fill out the Republican ticket with Mr. Lieberman, a supporter of abortion rights, had become too intense to be ignored.

With time running out, and after a long meeting with his inner circle in Phoenix, Mr. McCain finally picked up the phone last Sunday and reached Ms. Palin at the Alaska State Fair. Although the campaign’s polling on Mr. McCain’s potential running mates was inconclusive on the selection of Ms. Palin — virtually no one had heard of her, a McCain adviser said — the governor, who opposes abortion, had glowing reviews from influential social conservatives.
This might be splitting hairs, but I think the pressure was probably not to take Palin, but to NOT take Lieberman.
User avatar
Teal
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8620
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am

Post by Teal »

And Jared, I don't consider the NYT to be the most objective newspaper in the world.
www.trailheadoutfitters.org
trailheadoutfitters.wordpress.com
facebook.com/Intentional.Fatherhood
User avatar
RobVarak
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8684
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Naperville, IL

Post by RobVarak »

wco81 wrote:
RobVarak wrote:I've never once heard McCain suggest that Obama would sacrifice the war for his own ambition.

On July 22, 2008, McCain was quoted as saying the following:
"It seems to me that Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign."
http://www.time.com/time/politics/artic ... 64,00.html

I stand corrected on that point, despite the fact that I do agree with McCain's assertion. :) In the law, truth is an absolute defense...

I also stand by the larger point. The Obama campaign continues to react to every substantive criticism of its candidate as an attack on his character. Saying that someone lacks knowledge or judgment is fair. The GOP was far more gracious in its response to Obama's scare-mongering in his acceptance.
Last edited by RobVarak on Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
XBL Gamertag: RobVarak

"Ok I'm an elitist, but I have a healthy respect for people who don't measure up." --Aaron Sorkin
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

Teal wrote:Palin was a much better pick, anyway. I love Joe Lieberman. But he'd have divided the party tremendously.
I agree, but it's very odd that Lieberman was attached to McCain's hip the past several month's and McCain was never in contact with Palin until a few days before the pick. Whether or not you now like the pick doesn't change that it didn't look very "maverick-like". Makes you think the party is running the candidate, rather than the other way around as McCain would have you believe.
Last edited by JackB1 on Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RobVarak
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8684
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Naperville, IL

Post by RobVarak »

XXXIV wrote:
JackB1 wrote:
Slumberland wrote:
This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008 ... _were.html
What is Palin going to do when confronted with world leaders that are a lot more unfriendly than the press or our own media?
Probably what she always does.
Bake them cookies?
XBL Gamertag: RobVarak

"Ok I'm an elitist, but I have a healthy respect for people who don't measure up." --Aaron Sorkin
User avatar
Jared
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jared »

Teal wrote:And Jared, I don't consider the NYT to be the most objective newspaper in the world.
To be clear, I'm never a big fan of discounting an article strictly because of the source. However, this was reported by a lot of other sources other than the NYT.
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

XXXIV wrote:
JackB1 wrote:
Slumberland wrote:
This is disturbing, re: Palin. Or rather, the way they've decided to handle her. The press is given to excess but there must be some sort of middle ground between throwing her to the dogs and hermetically sealing her away.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008 ... _were.html
What is Palin going to do when confronted with world leaders that are a lot more unfriendly than the press or our own media?
Probably what she always does.
Build a hockey rink for them?
User avatar
pk500
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 33885
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Syracuse, N.Y.
Contact:

Post by pk500 »

Teal wrote:And Jared, I don't consider the NYT to be the most objective newspaper in the world.
Is there such thing as an objective daily paper in your eyes, Teal?

Take care,
PK
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

JackB1 wrote: Build a hockey rink for them?
RobVarak wrote: Bake them cookies?
:lol: ...
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

pk500 wrote:
Teal wrote:And Jared, I don't consider the NYT to be the most objective newspaper in the world.
Is there such thing as an objective daily paper in your eyes, Teal?

Take care,
PK
My names not Teal...but the way I see it...They all have bents. Human nature.
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

I just saw a great post. It said:

"Note to Sara Palin:
Jesus was a community organizer"

:)
Locked