Right on, Tony! High probability I'll see you there!MUTTS wrote:Just picked up tix for HBO card at Turning Stone in October!

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
Right on, Tony! High probability I'll see you there!MUTTS wrote:Just picked up tix for HBO card at Turning Stone in October!
pk500 wrote:Yes, the decision was dubious, at best. But let's not lose sight of an overarching fact of the Canelo-GGG bout: That was a really good, competitive fight among two of the very best practitioners of the Sweet Science in the world.
Canelo-GGG II on Cinco de Mayo weekend next May, in Vegas. Book it!
Your post is spot-on except for one thing: Any inference this fight was fixed to guarantee a rematch is silly. There was a rematch clause in the contract for this fight before both fighters stepped into the ring.wco81 wrote:Teddy Atlas is calling out the same judge.
Says boxing can't give itself more black eyes than it already has.
Problem is there is no national commission. So the promoters get to go judge shopping. There doesn't have to be explicit bribes because the judges understand they won't get to work in the future unless they deliver the results which the promoters want.
Boxing is the only major sport where there's no separation of church and state. The people who make the money, the promoters, wield too much power over the people who administer the sport, the local commissions.
The thing I see is that only a handful of boxers at a time are big draws. They can't get huge PPV sales out of most matches. So when they get a big match, the incentive is going to be to milk it to maximize the money.
Atlas says sure there will be a lucrative rematch lined up. But it won't be fair to Glovkin because of his age. Even in one year, he's going to decline.
Because Mexican Independence Day weekend (last night) and Cinco de Mayo are the two biggest weekends in boxing for megafights due to the big Mexican-American fan base for boxing. Especially important since Canelo is Mexican and GGG has a strong Mexican fanbase.grtwhtsk wrote:Why would a rematch have to wait 8 months? Let's see them go in four, January 2018.
Yes. But I don't think GGG has slipped nearly as much as some experts say.grtwhtsk wrote:Paul, is GGG's age a concern? I have seen the decline in other boxers, and it can be quite rapid....and sad? Sorry if it's a dumb question, just figured I would ask the boxing expert!
Well, he's probably fighting Billy Joe Saunders or Miguel Cotto in December -- so much for GGG's concern about slippage!grtwhtsk wrote:Paul, my concern is slippage in 8 months. I don't doubt GGG and his ability at all. I just don't want Father Time getting in his way.
That's what I love so much about the late 70's early 80's boxing era. Those dudes fought multiple times a year against the very best. In fact they went looking for the best to fight. Leonard fought Hearns, Hagler, Duran all in their prime and vice versa. Mega fights in the 80's were all too common because top flight boxer didn't duck the very best until they were in decline. That's why I could never put Mayweather Jr in the group of the greatest of all time. He only fought someone when he had the advantage whereas the 4 Kings of Boxing went looking for the best.pk500 wrote:Well, he's probably fighting Billy Joe Saunders or Miguel Cotto in December -- so much for GGG's concern about slippage!grtwhtsk wrote:Paul, my concern is slippage in 8 months. I don't doubt GGG and his ability at all. I just don't want Father Time getting in his way.
Activity is one of the reasons I love Golovkin. He's 35 and wants to fight again this year. Meanwhile, Canelo -- who I like, not love -- is only 27 and already has become a semi-annual boxer, fighting only on Cinco de Mayo and Mexican Independence Day.
GGG is a throwback. Love that man.
Fine fighter who reached his peak in the Super 6. But Ward pissed away his career after winning that tournament due to ducking foes, taking long hiatuses, promotional squabbles, etc.grtwhtsk wrote:WOW!! Andre Ward retired!! http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/2 ... ing-boxing
Arguello/Pryor = classic. Love it. Man, those were the days.Rodster wrote:That's what I love so much about the late 70's early 80's boxing era. Those dudes fought multiple times a year against the very best. In fact they went looking for the best to fight. Leonard fought Hearns, Hagler, Duran all in their prime and vice versa. Mega fights in the 80's were all too common because top flight boxer didn't duck the very best until they were in decline. That's why I could never put Mayweather Jr in the group of the greatest of all time. He only fought someone when he had the advantage whereas the 4 Kings of Boxing went looking for the best.pk500 wrote:Well, he's probably fighting Billy Joe Saunders or Miguel Cotto in December -- so much for GGG's concern about slippage!grtwhtsk wrote:Paul, my concern is slippage in 8 months. I don't doubt GGG and his ability at all. I just don't want Father Time getting in his way.
Activity is one of the reasons I love Golovkin. He's 35 and wants to fight again this year. Meanwhile, Canelo -- who I like, not love -- is only 27 and already has become a semi-annual boxer, fighting only on Cinco de Mayo and Mexican Independence Day.
GGG is a throwback. Love that man.
I still can't forget watching Leonard and Hearns on ABC with Howard Cosell calling the action or Alexis Argeullo and Aaron Pryor on CBS for free. Now that was one helluva throwdown and then you had the up and comers like Boom Boom Mancini and Hector Camacho.
Insert Marvin Hagler, Roberto Duran or Sugar Ray Leonard who destroyed his dad back in the 80’s. Any thoughts on Britain’s Anthony Joshua? That is one big, scary looking dude.pk500 wrote: The Hitman could have polished off Mayweather.