
Funny how they don't show one of the best teams ever, the 1999 St. Louis Rams.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
Stan has never heard of the greatest show on turf.MizzouRah wrote:A video with our St. Louis sportscaster, Steve Savard.![]()
Funny how they don't show one of the best teams ever, the 1999 St. Louis Rams.
Patriots -3 is my lock of this weekend.Brando70 wrote:I think Patriots win this weekend. Manning has so little on his throws he makes Teddy Bridgewater look like he has a cannon. As good as the Broncos defense can be, giving up 300 to a half-armed Big Ben plus a number of big plays doesn't bode well. This feels like a game that stays close into the fourth quarter, and I have to go with the BELIBOT 3000, Gronk!, and the QB with a blinding amount of bling on his fingers.
Manning looks like he's throwing into a headwind even when it's calm. If Manning was forced to make the same Hail Mary throw as Rodgers at the end of regulation Saturday night, it would have fallen to Earth like a mortally wounded duck at the 10-yard line.wco81 wrote:If the conditions are windy or cold, yeah that will limit Manning, unless they somehow run like crazy on the Pats.
pk500 wrote:
The guy is completely shot unless he can get a nice HGH shipment from OMAHA! this week.
Agree. My above post wasn't an ode to skirting the rules. It was more about changing the rules. But even that would be tricky. Teams and players would invent injuries so guys could take HGH to get bigger, stronger and faster. A giant black hole of enforcement.Aristo wrote:I have no problem using his case to make an argument for allowing it. But the Broncos and Manning ought to be punished if he was using HGH on the side.
Given that my son is just now starting to get into playing sports, there's no way in hell he's playing football. There are too many other options out there that can be physical competitions without crashing your head into things on purpose every time. Playing other sports will likely result in concussions too (I got one playing soccer for F's sake) but it's just about minimizing that risk.pk500 wrote:In other words: You're not going to see many upper-middle and upper-class white kids from the 'burbs playing football in 2050. The more parents and the general public learn, the more they deter their offspring from putting on the pads and helmet.
The New York Times reported last September high school football participation was down 2.5 percent this year, with Pop Warner seeing greater declines. Those numbers are just a trickle. But the pace will increase.
Smart move and it's going to have a knock on effect at the College and Pro level in 10-20 yrs. A few years ago Terry Bradshaw said that the NFL will be totally different in 10-15 yrs. And that's why the NFL is trying to expand out in Europe. They're seeing all the concussion lawsuits flying and Soccer expanding in the US. A lot of athletes like LeBron have said they wouldn't let their kids play football.dbdynsty25 wrote:Given that my son is just now starting to get into playing sports, there's no way in hell he's playing football.
I agree. I just cannot see allowing your kid to play a sport where the odds of a debilitating injury are much higher than any other sport. Add in all the concussion data and its a (no pun intended) no brainer.dbdynsty25 wrote:Given that my son is just now starting to get into playing sports, there's no way in hell he's playing football.pk500 wrote:In other words: You're not going to see many upper-middle and upper-class white kids from the 'burbs playing football in 2050. The more parents and the general public learn, the more they deter their offspring from putting on the pads and helmet.
The New York Times reported last September high school football participation was down 2.5 percent this year, with Pop Warner seeing greater declines. Those numbers are just a trickle. But the pace will increase.
Great point about the regional appeal of football, too. Add that to the demographic evolution of the sport, and football will look more like boxing than we think in 50 years.dbdynsty25 wrote:Football is going to continue to decline until it's something that is done in certain areas of the country. Kind of like Lacrosse back East. Football will be dominant in the Texas and southern region (like it is now) and that will be that. It'll still exist, just not nearly at the level it currently sits (financially and the amount of participants).
DivotMaker wrote:LOL.....