Madden 09 Discussion

Welcome to the Digital Sportspage forum.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady

Post Reply
User avatar
Brando70
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 7597
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 3:00 am
Location: In Transition, IL

Post by Brando70 »

sportdan30 wrote:Additional info from the Senior Designer. Here's a little bit more clarification:

http://www.operationsports.com/forums/m ... rs-ea.html
That actually explains a lot and piggybacks on what Bill had posted.

I actually see a postive side to this. With the old Madden sliders, you often had to make two adjustments to get one result. For instance, you would need to tweak pass blocking or run blocking and break block to tweak pass rushing or how the defense plays the run. Now, you can just adjust one side to get the same result. Adjusting your pass blocking will adjust the CPU pass rushing ability at the same time. Adjusting your break block will impact the CPUs ability to run. Your QB accuracy probably affects CPU interceptions as well as accuracy. It's actually easier to understand than the way it was before.

The problem I see is that there are CPU abilities you can't tweak with these sliders, namely the CPU QB accuracy, CPU catching, and RB fumble abilities. These don't really have corresponding sliders. From the few games people like Bill have played, it doesn't seem like CPU catching or CPU fumbling are really a problem. It's the CPU passing accuracy. If that gets addressed in the first patch, I would imagine the other slider adjustments would work at least as well as previous Madden sliders did :D

I seriously doubt they will add any sliders via patch. If something like the accelerated clock was too big for the MS download, I can't imagine adding new CPU sliders will fit.
User avatar
JRod
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 5386
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 3:00 am

Post by JRod »

Brando,

I think that's how it should work. Like Jared said, that's not how EA makes it work though.


I wish CPU ratings meant, 100% realistic NFL stats. The sliders adjusted this to make it easier or harder acheive that. The backbone to madden is broken and that's way sliders were needed.

If in CPU v CPU teams, it was 90% realistic, in score, stats, playcalling and then human sliders adjusted one's game to replicate that experience, I would enjoy that game.

I'm not opposed to a lack of sliders, I'm opposed to problems in the game that we can't fix and have to wait and spend another $60 to fix.
[url=http://sensiblecoasters.wordpress.com/][b]Sensible Coasters - A critique of sports games, reviews, gaming sites and news. Questionably Proofread![/b][/url]
User avatar
greggsand
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3065
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:00 am
Location: los angeles
Contact:

Post by greggsand »

Be curious how the reviews are going to play out on this one.
User avatar
Brando70
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 7597
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 3:00 am
Location: In Transition, IL

Post by Brando70 »

I agree, JRod, and it's why I'm not nearly as concerned about how Madden plays with sliders as I am concerned with how it plays out of the box.

The difference is the slider problem seems less severe to me than it did yesterday. Take CPU running. With the old way, you had to tweak run blocking and RB ability on the CPU side AND your defensive sliders. With the new way, you just adjust your run defense. These are both gaming the system -- whether the CPU blockers and backs get boosted or my defenders get weakened, you're still forcing the game to "cheat" to make the CPU run better. That's why the big question for me is how the game plays out of the box. If a game is already good, it should need very few if any slider adjustments. If it isn't, usually the sliders are like painting a pig.

The big oversight is CPU passing. Your defenders getting stuck on blocks or missing tackles can be accepted in a lot of cases, but it's difficult to play a football game where incompletions only occur on deflections, drops, and interceptions. That will get really old really quickly. But Bill said that, from what he's seen, the Human QB Acc slider hasn't had much affect on bad passes either (big surprise there). To me, it seems like CPU QB accuracy is more of a programming issue than a slider one. The first patch really needs to fix this to keep the game from being completely unbalanced.

I will say I am shocked to see an EA guy telling us this stuff two weeks before the release. The usual MO is that we would have heard all about "new and advanced sliders" only to find out, as Bill did, that there are no direct CPU adjustments.
User avatar
wco81
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 9575
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 3:00 am
Location: San Jose

Post by wco81 »

EA doesn't position these games as arcade or casual. They're not NFL Blitz.

They have their own, NFL Street or NFL Tour or whatever.

But neither are they some ultimate sim which will produce statistical results comparable to real life stats.

The "fun" factor can come from lowering expectations. If you see things in the games which you wouldn't see in the sports they represent, you can either be pissed off or just shake your head and go about trying to get some entertainment value out of it.

When you see QBs throwing for too high completion percentages, it may not be by design. I don't think EA is trying to produce a game with larger-than-life performances or results. So when you see imbalances like that, it's unintentional and now, it's becoming clear that they're incapable of fixing them.
User avatar
Jared
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jared »

The fact that Ian/TheFuture15 is posting at OS is a really good sign, especially because he seems to be really interested in making a fun, sim-style game...and that may bode well for the future of the game. They supposedly got rid of some of the gameplay tricks that are overused for the tourney crowd on All-Pro and All-Madden...that's an accomplishment in itself. (Though how will I get on the Madden bus now that they've taken away my l33t skillz?!?!?!?)

As for only having human sliders, for that to work, there seems to be the assumption that the default CPU attributes lead to a perfect (or perfectly realistic) brand of football, and that the only thing that needs to be changed are the human's abilities based on that. But that clearly doesn't hold for things like CPU passing accuracy, if the computer is always on target.

As for "the masses", I really don't think that they are all 30-yard backpedal pinpoint bomb freaks. People play that way because people like to win, and it is often the best way to win. In NCAA 2009 online now, it's all about crossing routes and mismatches. If NCAA 2010 was severely skewed to the running game, everyone online would shift to run run run.

I'm sure people will still play (and love) Madden if it's more sim, as it's an institution and is the only NFL game around. If the best way to beat your friends is to stay in the pocket, make your reads, and vary your playcalling, then people will change their playstyles. It's up to the game designers to adjust/change the game engine to facilitate those kinds of changes.
User avatar
MizzouRah
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8208
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Troy, Mo

Post by MizzouRah »

Leebo33 wrote:
XXXIV wrote:
JRod wrote: Come on Bill, give some impressions about Head Coach!
Yeah....what up with that?...Give!
OK. I'm with ya. F Abner until we get HC impressions! :D
Me too.. F U Abner until you post some HC impressions!!! :lol:

Just the fact you even played Madden before HC baffles me! :P
User avatar
ScoopBrady
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 7781
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Post by ScoopBrady »

Leebo33 wrote:I'm on the same page as Web on this topic. I enjoy this forum and the people on it, but I think we've become way too predictable and boring on both sides of the fun/casual/hardcore debate. Just the fact that we can have a "F Abner" post without any reaction kind of indicates to me the way this board has turned against the so-called "hardcore" sports gamer. I know it was probably a joke and Siam is a nut, but there have been other posts in other threads from other people that kind of hints at the same thing. Guys taking their time to speak about what they see/enjoy/hate shouldn't have to have their contributions greeted with the inevitable sarcasm of posters talking about how they must have got the "special" copy or extolling the virtues of just having fun like folks with a negative impression are loathing, fun-hating, pricks. I'm am totally cool if this community continues to lean towards casual gaming, but it is important to note that it is heading that way. I know I'll still come here for the fun OT threads and to "hang out" either way.

Some people need to understand that users critical of games *can* enjoy them and have fun! There are *very* few posters here that I think have agendas, bias against companies, or unreasonable complaints. Even if I do think they have bias I enjoy reading their posts and getting a laugh. The other night I played a game of NCAA Football where my freakin' defensive lineman didn't rush the passer...they just stood at the line of scrimmage (but the offensive line continued to block where they *should have been*). This was on the most important last play of the game. The QB stood for about 10 seconds and then threw a pick...LOL. I thought it was ridiculous, but I still had fun (don't ask me what I would have done if I had lost). I've lowered my standards so much for NCAA in hopes of a fun experience against the CPU that my new idea of fun is trying to win the Heisman (going to be hard to do with Evan Royster when CPU QBs are throwing 56 TDs a season though but his inflated punt returns may help) and the NC.

In fairness, there have been shots both ways and the "hardcore", "realism", or whatever term you want to use crowd needs to realize that the casual/fun crowd aren't a bunch of mediocre accepting, easy pleasing, rose-colored glasses-wearing sissies :lol:
I am just going to go ahead and get this out of the way because I have sensed some underlying animosity towards myself by a few posters here. I was quite verbal (by typing of course :lol: ) about the negativity that was flooding these forums months back. I took a lot of s*** about it at the time and still do to this day. For the record I have never felt or expressed that people are not entitled to expressing their opinion whether it be positive or negative, with me or against me. What I expressed was the fact that the negativity was being harped on. Just like I don't want to read a total strokefest about a game I don't want to read a total bashfest either. Just like any conversation I have in real life I don't want to hear the same s*** over and over from the same person. I got it the first time and don't need to be reminded of it every other post. I don't think there's anybody posting here now that is guilty of that and I truly and honestly feel that it is a better atmosphere as a result.

I think it is natural to defend a game that others are bashing that you are genuinely enjoying. Case in point Top Spin 3. I played the demo and didn't like it. I posted as much in the thread and those enjoying the game defended it saying it took some getting used to and once you understand how to play the game gets much better. This convinced me to delve further into the demo to see if I could see what they were seeing. There came a time when things clicked and I did start to see what they were seeing. It was short-lived though and then I started disliking the game again because while I understood how the controls were working I came to a realization of how the game was working and I didn't like it. I stated as much in the thread and felt as though I had made my opinion known without attacking those that were enjoying it. I didn't feel the need to put quotation marks around words as if to say the word fun is a bad one. I also wouldn't have felt the need to change quotation marks to asterisks if something was mentioned about said quotation marks. That's how I envision these forums working at their best; when we can all express our opinions about the games and not make others feel stupid for having a differing opinion.

I put myself out there in a couple of recent threads trying to explain my epiphany with sports gaming, hell life in general, and all I got was back-handed remarks and quotation marks. I was made to feel as if I didn't belong here anymore because I expressed that what I look for in games is different now. That since my daughter taught me how to have fun again that I was f***ed in the head and no longer knew what I was talking about.

I am not the type that will say one thing and do another. I expect civility in all of our discussions and think that the Top Spin 3 thread is a perfect example of a thread that had differing opinions that nobody was personally attacked and the same thing wasn't being said over and over again. It really was a good thread and made it easy for anyone interested to get the information they needed to decide whether or not they wanted to try the game for themselves or not. Posters even offered advice to help others who weren't enjoying the game.

All I have ever strived for around here is a community that can express negativity without being so negative while doing it. It used to be that way here and when I spoke out about it that was because it had changed. I have definitely been misunderstood by some of you because it seems as though I've been pegged with the reputation of being nothing but positive and not wanting to hear negative thoughts about games. That could not be further from the truth. To those who feel that way about me please read what I just wrote and try to see where I am coming from rather than pegging me as that guy. Maybe I haven't done the best at expressing that in words but I think I've done a good job of expressing that through my actions. If you still feel I'm responsible for ruining DSP than I sincerely apologize, that was not my intent.
I am a patient boy.
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait.
My time is water down a drain.
User avatar
Danimal
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 12193
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 3:00 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Danimal »

I don't know why your apologizing to anyone.

If people feel DSP is ruined and not what they want it to be then why do they continue to visit the site. It's not like were in a cult compound and you can't leave.

I'm sick of "this place is too positive" crap too. Some people on here are negative all the time so it goes both ways.
Follow Me on:
YouTube - www.youtube.com/maxpixelation/
Twitch - twitch.tv/maximumpixelation
Twitter - twitter.com/maxpixelation
User avatar
Jared
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3618
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jared »

Just to let everyone know, I don't care if posts slant casual or sim, positive or negative, etc. Everyone's opinions are welcome here, as long as they aren't just "bla bla sux".

In fact, I think we've got a decent number of posters that are on both sides of the casual/sim debate. I'm definitely more of a sim player myself, but I'm happy to hear the opinions of others that are not.
User avatar
ScoopBrady
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 7781
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Post by ScoopBrady »

Hey, even though I throw around the word fun now doesn't mean that I don't enjoy sim. I still prefer sim but decided to try and have fun again. I guess you can say that I'm easily distracted now if I'm having fun playing the game. I'm willing to overlook stuff I didn't in the past if I'm still having fun. It's like making out with a chick who isn't the prettiest girl in the world but boy those titties are something else! Am I going to put her on the short list to marry? No. Am I going to go back for more? Hell yeah!
I am a patient boy.
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait.
My time is water down a drain.
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

ScoopBrady wrote:Hey, even though I throw around the word fun now doesn't mean that I don't enjoy sim. I still prefer sim but decided to try and have fun again. I guess you can say that I'm easily distracted now if I'm having fun playing the game. I'm willing to overlook stuff I didn't in the past if I'm still having fun. It's like making out with a chick who isn't the prettiest girl in the world but boy those titties are something else! Am I going to put her on the short list to marry? No. Am I going to go back for more? Hell yeah!
:lol: ...Nice...

Yep...If the game is fun. The game is fun...It doesnt mean I dont dislike the flaws.

I want the games to be as sim as possible... but at the end of the day the reason I play games is to have fun.

NCAA is the perfect example...screwed up as some of the game is Im having a blast playing it.
User avatar
Leebo33
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 6592
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: PA

Post by Leebo33 »

ScoopBrady wrote:quotation marks around words as if to say the word fun is a bad one. I also wouldn't have felt the need to change quotation marks to asterisks if something was mentioned about said quotation marks.
I found this definition for quotation marks: "Either of a pair of punctuation marks used primarily to mark the beginning and end of a passage attributed to another and repeated word for word, but also to indicate meanings or glosses and to indicate the unusual or dubious status of a word." I can see why you would think I was using it in the dubious sense but I was actually trying to convey that it is just an unusual word in the sense of a videogame because my idea of "fun" can differ so much from your idea of "fun." I deleted the posts because I was annoyed that a mod at my favorite videogame site was more concerned about my punctuation than the quality of my posts. I couldn't understand why the use of quotes, something that JackB does frequently in every sentence, would bother you so much. I obviously could understand how putting the word "fun" would slightly annoy after you posted but that was not my sole intention and I didn't know, nor did you tell me, you were taking it personal.

It's been a great ride and I've enjoyed my stay, but it's obvious that you and I just can't seem to get along. Danimal is 100% right. This isn't a compound. The last thing you need to do is apologize to anyone as you've done absolutley nothing wrong. I'm 40 years old and really don't need to get into flame wars at a videogame site, especially ones that are unintentional. I honestly feel that you are a good guy, but I think it's best that I take a break. It's going to be easier for you to mod without worrying about these past issues and it's going to be easier for me because I'm offending you without even trying and I don't want to think about each post and how it's going to be taken. I'm just ready for the discussion to get back on-topic and the fastest way to that is getting rid of the distractions. I'll be lurking and PMing as I still think this place is great.
User avatar
Danimal
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 12193
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 3:00 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Danimal »

Leebo33 wrote:Danimal is 100% right.
Can I add this to my sig? I don't think I'll ever see these words in print again :)

Sorry trying to lighten the mood.
Follow Me on:
YouTube - www.youtube.com/maxpixelation/
Twitch - twitch.tv/maximumpixelation
Twitter - twitter.com/maxpixelation
Inuyasha
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4638
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 3:00 am

Post by Inuyasha »

Leebo33 wrote:
ScoopBrady wrote:quotation marks around words as if to say the word fun is a bad one. I also wouldn't have felt the need to change quotation marks to asterisks if something was mentioned about said quotation marks.
I found this definition for quotation marks: "Either of a pair of punctuation marks used primarily to mark the beginning and end of a passage attributed to another and repeated word for word, but also to indicate meanings or glosses and to indicate the unusual or dubious status of a word." I can see why you would think I was using it in the dubious sense but I was actually trying to convey that it is just an unusual word in the sense of a videogame because my idea of "fun" can differ so much from your idea of "fun." I deleted the posts because I was annoyed that a mod at my favorite videogame site was more concerned about my punctuation than the quality of my posts. I couldn't understand why the use of quotes, something that JackB does frequently in every sentence, would bother you so much. I obviously could understand how putting the word "fun" would slightly annoy after you posted but that was not my sole intention and I didn't know, nor did you tell me, you were taking it personal.

It's been a great ride and I've enjoyed my stay, but it's obvious that you and I just can't seem to get along. Danimal is 100% right. This isn't a compound. The last thing you need to do is apologize to anyone as you've done absolutley nothing wrong. I'm 40 years old and really don't need to get into flame wars at a videogame site, especially ones that are unintentional. I honestly feel that you are a good guy, but I think it's best that I take a break. It's going to be easier for you to mod without worrying about these past issues and it's going to be easier for me because I'm offending you without even trying and I don't want to think about each post and how it's going to be taken. I'm just ready for the discussion to get back on-topic and the fastest way to that is getting rid of the distractions. I'll be lurking and PMing as I still think this place is great.
Please Don't leave. You're the only friend I have remaining in the message board world. :(
User avatar
MizzouRah
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8208
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Troy, Mo

Post by MizzouRah »

Inuyasha wrote:
Please Don't leave. You're the only friend I have remaining in the message board world. :(
What, we're not friends? :?
User avatar
MizzouRah
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8208
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Troy, Mo

Post by MizzouRah »

Leebo33 wrote:
I found this definition for quotation marks: "Either of a pair of punctuation marks used primarily to mark the beginning and end of a passage attributed to another and repeated word for word, but also to indicate meanings or glosses and to indicate the unusual or dubious status of a word." I can see why you would think I was using it in the dubious sense but I was actually trying to convey that it is just an unusual word in the sense of a videogame because my idea of "fun" can differ so much from your idea of "fun." I deleted the posts because I was annoyed that a mod at my favorite videogame site was more concerned about my punctuation than the quality of my posts. I couldn't understand why the use of quotes, something that JackB does frequently in every sentence, would bother you so much. I obviously could understand how putting the word "fun" would slightly annoy after you posted but that was not my sole intention and I didn't know, nor did you tell me, you were taking it personal.

It's been a great ride and I've enjoyed my stay, but it's obvious that you and I just can't seem to get along. Danimal is 100% right. This isn't a compound. The last thing you need to do is apologize to anyone as you've done absolutley nothing wrong. I'm 40 years old and really don't need to get into flame wars at a videogame site, especially ones that are unintentional. I honestly feel that you are a good guy, but I think it's best that I take a break. It's going to be easier for you to mod without worrying about these past issues and it's going to be easier for me because I'm offending you without even trying and I don't want to think about each post and how it's going to be taken. I'm just ready for the discussion to get back on-topic and the fastest way to that is getting rid of the distractions. I'll be lurking and PMing as I still think this place is great.
Not a biggie Leebo.. please stay, I enjoy your posts just as much as anyone else's. :(
User avatar
XXXIV
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 17337
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:00 am
Location: United States

Post by XXXIV »

MizzouRah wrote: Not a biggie Leebo.. please stay, I enjoy your posts just as much as anyone else's. :(
Same Here!
User avatar
Leebo33
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 6592
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: PA

Post by Leebo33 »

Stop it you bastards or everyone will know that I'm doing this for my ego. Seriously, I need a break.
User avatar
ScoopBrady
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 7781
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Post by ScoopBrady »

Honestly Leebo don't leave on account of this. When I originally pointed out the use of quotation marks in the NCAA thread you were not the only one using them. I did notice that after I brought up the word fun that the word fun started getting sandwiched between a pair of quotation marks. This being the internet intent isn't the easiest thing to perceive and I took it in the dubious sense. It wasn't just you though. Every fun sandwich (TM Scoop Brady Inc.) I saw in that thread came across as "Aw, isn't that cute, they're having fun." I think you can see why I thought the asterisks were a dig at me. I responded to your post in this thread to clear the air and I certainly don't consider it a flame war. I truly just wanted to be understood better because I felt that there were a couple of posters here that misunderstood me. That is all. No reason for you to leave as there's certainly no ill-will "here." (See what I did there as an attempt to persuade you to stay? I made a funny. :D )
I am a patient boy.
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait.
My time is water down a drain.
User avatar
Leebo33
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 6592
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: PA

Post by Leebo33 »

No problem, Scoop.

Where the hell are those Abner Head Coach impressions? :D
User avatar
jcalvert
Panda Cub
Panda Cub
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Columbus, GA
Contact:

Post by jcalvert »

I removed a bunch of quotes because it was too damn hard to follow, but basically I started off with EA is going after the mass market, not folks that post on this board. So with that ...
webdanzer wrote:So what is the conclusion to this line of thinking? That the hardcore should not be allowed to post their thoughts or criticisms of a game because they are not the target audience?!?
I think you (as well other long time posters here) know me well enough to know that is not what I meant. My point was that the hard core sim fans do not really have a voice when it comes to the money equation. Sure, as seen on OS, a very vocal minority, but not the Madden purchasing majority.

Something like that.
jcalvert
www.calvertgames.com
Inuyasha
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4638
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 3:00 am

Post by Inuyasha »

Ya don't leave. I've already been dumped by the following people on message boards :

Sportsguy1992
Hipe
BBReBozo
PK500
Vinny-B
NutsackGreg
Lyrian
JohandasRandy
MustyArmpit
GoodDolphin
BigFan
SouthSideCynic
GridironAssassin


And I have somewhat of an estranged relationship with WCO81.

LEEBO-WAN....you're my only hope!
User avatar
jcalvert
Panda Cub
Panda Cub
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Columbus, GA
Contact:

Post by jcalvert »

ScoopBrady wrote:All I'm trying to say is the fact that the hardcore sports gamer is not EA's target audience because it is such a small portion of the sales of the game. All of the changes they make regarding the game are geared towards the other demographic, not the hardcore demographic. That's all I am saying.
I did not read far enough down before I made my first reply. I think you may have said it better than me.
ScoopBrady wrote:This is ridiculous, the game's not even out yet. :roll:
Absolutely. Agree 100%. I am not sure what to think at this point. I wish NCAA Football 09 would get all the gameplay patches before Madden was released; that would help me make my decision right now.
jcalvert
www.calvertgames.com
User avatar
macsomjrr
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 1847
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 3:00 am
Location: Corona, CA

Post by macsomjrr »

sooooooooooooooo....

Back on topic. Has anyone played the demo yet???? I'm now officially excited about Madden '09 after checking it out and playing a few demo games.
Post Reply