wco81 wrote:But with Kobe and Jackson, you knew they were going to get consideration from the league. The way Duncan does not when he's fouled inside. For the season to date, Kobe is averaging 10.7 FT attempts compared to 6.9 attempts for Duncan. Of course, Kobe is hoisting 27.7 FG attempts compared to just 15.7 for Duncan. But you see Duncan get hacked inside with no calls a lot more often than you see Kobe, who generates a lot of his scoring with jumpers.
While Kobe does get more calls due to his superstar stature, He and Duncan are apples and oranges as far as comparsions imo. Kobe is pretty much relentless in attacking the rim forcing calls to be made. For all Duncan's wonderful gifts, he is not exactly a monster down low meaning he's not exactly Shaq forcing the issue every time. He often operates up at the high post and is more than content to take a short range jumper. The league historically has tended to let more big man action take place before a foul is called otherwise you'd end up with fouls every single trip down court.
wco81 wrote: I don't buy this argument that Kobe HAS to take all these shots because Odom is so inadequate. Kobe has attempted over twice as many FGs, they're both averaging about 40 miutes per game. Odom has a higher FG percentage and they're about the same from 3-point range. Now Odom isn't capable of scoring 82 or even 50. But obviously, they're going to give Kobe the ball and let him shoot unless he's doubled and he gives it up (and guys like Parker are hitting wide open shots to make it difficult to double Kobe).
Lamar Odom is not Scottie Pippen no matter how much broadcasters try to make that comparison. Pippen was a legit superstar on his own. Odom is a good enough well rounded player but he's not a star. The lakers lost their other scorer, Butler when they picked up Kwame who can't score at all. Remove Kobe and swap in a player who's just "good" and they are one of the worst teams in the league.
Whether he HAS has to shoot this much for them to be to win is debatable. In the long-term strategy clearly not as he'll just end up burning himself out. In the short term, however, it's not unfeasible. You can't just look at Odom's FG percentages and assume he can score more because historically he really hasn't. Kobe takes good and bad shots. You can argue that drags down his FG% because he has to take them no matter what for his team to have a chance. Odom has the benefit of still only taking the shots he normally does. In other words he's not carrying the load which is why it's not always 100% to just look at a players FG% percentage to estimate who should be taking shots on a team. Iverson is another example of a player generally in this situation.
http://www.whas11.com/sharedcontent/VideoPlayer/videoPlayer.php?vidId=49293&catId=49
---Lend a ***** a pencil--- Context?