
Just wondering if you gear heads heard anythign about it?
Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
Very good point by Don. The online racing was fun once you were on the track. But the flaws in the menus and basic setup were atrocious:DChaps wrote:In last years Chase for the Cup version of EA's Nascar series the horrible online interface, limited number of online opponents, and pretty bad frame rate issues in certain scenarios killed it for me. However, I have not followed the progress or feature set of this years console version.
So they could have called it Andretti Green Total Team Control?pk500 wrote:The new feature this year is "Total Team Control." It allows you to use voice or joystick commands to team up with teammates, making drafting decisions, blocking decisions of rivals, etc. It's based on reality, as Jeff Gordon will team up with real-life Hendrick Motorsports teammates Brian Vickers, Jimmie Johnson and Kyle Busch, for example, but not with Kurt Busch of Roush Racing.
True, true! Made me sick that Wheldon won last Sunday. I don't think there will be a racetrack big enough on Earth to contain his head now that the championship is almost in his palm, even if the guy is quite gifted.Dave wrote:So they could have called it Andretti Green Total Team Control?
Not sure about that price, Weaver. EB still shows both the PS2 and Xbox version retailing for $49.99. With its exclusive NASCAR license, I see no incentive for EA to drop the price.Weaver2005 wrote:Also, I think it's going to retail for $29.99.
They also need real optimatch options, that allow the player to search for races at specific tracks, durations, difficulty levels. 90% of the races in the lobby are Talladega, which is fun on occassion, but gets old real fast. Although most people knew that their offline setups were automatically used online, it would have been nice to have options to disable custom setups, or allow players the opportunity to load a setup before starting an online race.pk500 wrote: 1. No voice chat in online lobbies.
2. Only <b>four humans</b> per online race. WTF?
3. Every player would be tossed into a general lobby after each race. You couldn't keep the same group of four guys together for multiple races.
4. No Gamertag ID icon over the user-controlled cars. So unless you memorized which driver your human opponents were using in the pre-race lobby, you had to guess.
5. No caution flags in online racing.
I think their insistence on filling the online field with AI cars is part of the problem. One would think that if you could save the bandwidth required for the AI you could support 8 or more human racers, but that is not the case. Since they don't even give you the option to trade AI for human players, I assume there are fundamental weaknesses in the game's network components. On the bright side, even with just 4 human players, online is still pretty enjoyable. Anyone that has played much of the Papyrus Nascar games online knows that as you increase the number of human drivers, you increase the risk of races becoming unmitigated wreckfests. Maybe the 4 player limit is a blessing in disguise?...ok, probably notWeaver2005 wrote: I dont know why EA can't get at least 8-16 (or more) player cars online when other games can do it.
pk500 wrote:True, true! Made me sick that Wheldon won last Sunday. I don't think there will be a racetrack big enough on Earth to contain his head now that the championship is almost in his palm, even if the guy is quite gifted.
Take care,
PK
Not to threadjack, but I have been completely out of it racing-wise the last 6 weeks or so. I haven't watched the whole race from Sun. on Tivo yet, but what did Wheldon and AGR do that was so wrong?Dave wrote:I like Wheldon, despite his ego, since he drove for PacWest in Lights while I was there.
But the whole AGR team makes me want to puke with their complaining and tactics.
Me. Maybe not next week upon release since Moto GP 3 is coming out the same day, but definitely within the next two or three weeks.Sport73 wrote:I enjoyed last year's game, but I'm far from a NASCAR nut. I enjoy videogame driving when it's exciting & realistic.
How many here plan on picking this one up? If there are some good DSP race nights planned, I'm in; if not, I probably will pass on the single-player experience.
Actually, AGR/Wheldon didn't act up this past weekend, at least not from what I can consider. It is more the accumulation of their complaining and tactics--boycotting the autograph session, blocking, protecting each other, etc.--that has me rooting against them at this point.DChaps wrote:Not to threadjack, but I have been completely out of it racing-wise the last 6 weeks or so. I haven't watched the whole race from Sun. on Tivo yet, but what did Wheldon and AGR do that was so wrong?
PS - Did not know you were with PacWest Dave. Pretty cool. Big Mo was always a favorite of mine.
Don:DChaps wrote:Not to threadjack, but I have been completely out of it racing-wise the last 6 weeks or so. I haven't watched the whole race from Sun. on Tivo yet, but what did Wheldon and AGR do that was so wrong?
Definitely agree with you on this one.pk500 wrote:They're a perfect mirror of the way the youngest team owner behaved when he was a driver. An ideal match.
Doesn't the IRL have a pretty strict blocking rule? It always seemed to me that Barnhart was pretty consistent with calling that. If AGR is pulling that kind of crap why doesn't Barnhart do something about it?pk500 wrote:I can't speak for Dave, but from my perspective I'm just sick of AGR's tactics, on the track and off.
The entire AGR team, especially Wheldon, Kanaan and Franchitti, has succeeded Scott Sharp as the most vicious high-speed chicane in the IRL. They block like Jerry Kramer during the Packers' glory days.
I have absolutely never cared one bit about the personality of a driver. I hope most teams hire the best driver for the job, but I know sponsors and press potential factor into it.Dave wrote:Open-wheel owners have been hiring uninteresting drivers for too long. It doesn't matter how many races a Dan Wheldon or Tony Kanaan win, the public doesn't care. Deal with it and either develop a personality or shut up.
Mears is my all-time favorite as well, and a driver's off-track personality doesn't matter much to me, either. But we're part of that diminishing fan base. And you can argue that the presence of AJ and those greats made Mears a personality, just a calm collected one. There isn't a foil right now--to the general public, open wheel racing is infested with foreign robots driving small, fast cars.DChaps wrote:I have absolutely never cared one bit about the personality of a driver. I hope most teams hire the best driver for the job, but I know sponsors and press potential factor into it.
My favorite driver of all time, Rick Mears, was not known to have much of a personality. He was no AJ, Mario, Rutherford, or Bobby Unser when it comes to giving a sound bite. He just could drive the crap out of a race car. That's all I have ever really cared about as a racing fan.
I didn't mean to infer that Wheldon has earned his victories cheaply, although St. Pete and Motegi were gifts when Briscoe and Kanaan collided at St. Pete and Schecky ran out of fuel with three laps to go at Motegi.DChaps wrote:Doesn't the IRL have a pretty strict blocking rule? It always seemed to me that Barnhart was pretty consistent with calling that. If AGR is pulling that kind of crap why doesn't Barnhart do something about it?pk500 wrote:I can't speak for Dave, but from my perspective I'm just sick of AGR's tactics, on the track and off.
The entire AGR team, especially Wheldon, Kanaan and Franchitti, has succeeded Scott Sharp as the most vicious high-speed chicane in the IRL. They block like Jerry Kramer during the Packers' glory days.
I honestly haven't watched enough of the races this year to know all the incidents that you may be talking about, but hasn't Wheldon led like over 600 laps this year? Didn't he go from 16th to 1st at Indy, and 11th to 1st last Sunday? Wasn't he up on Hornish by like 12 seconds by the end of the race? Was that all achieved through blocking?
I admit I may be missing something. I just haven't seen Wheldon scoring these victories by blocking.
I agree that Michael has always been a whiner when things don't go his way. Rarely is there any wrong doing on his part.
PS - What in the world has happened to Ganassi?