Please God, no. (EA/NHL agreement?)
Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
- ScoopBrady
- DSP-Funk All-Star
- Posts: 7781
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 3:00 am
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
That is funny that they changed it so quickly. It does make you wonder if they are going to announce some sort of exclusivety deal when the NHL dispute is settled. Maybe someone jumped the gun a bit? Hopefully not because ESPN has put out some fantastic hockey titles and Gretzky shows a lot of promise.
I am a patient boy.
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait.
My time is water down a drain.
I wait, I wait, I wait, I wait.
My time is water down a drain.
Speaking as a copywriter who also does a lot of Web updates, that's what I'd think too. Probably got so used to putting up "exclusive" that s/he slipped up.Danimal wrote:Maybe it is just that some bleary eyed graphics designer was on his 60th hour of mandated work this week for EA and made a simple copy & paste error.
I really hope this is the case. But if you remember, word leaked early about the NFL license and EA denied it. Then word leaked early about the NCAA license and, again, EA denied it. If history is a guide, then I'm afraid we're in for some really bad news in another couple of weeks or so.Brando70 wrote:Speaking as a copywriter who also does a lot of Web updates, that's what I'd think too. Probably got so used to putting up "exclusive" that s/he slipped up.Danimal wrote:Maybe it is just that some bleary eyed graphics designer was on his 60th hour of mandated work this week for EA and made a simple copy & paste error.
That will be included on the PS2 version only...like the Madden CE from last year.10spro wrote:I hear that the 06 version may come packaged with the 93-94 Genesis version of NHL (arguably, one of the best EA has produced), so if the O6 version stinks again, you can go back to the game made some 10 years ago..
Wish I shared your optimism, bigmoe. Take a look at this old post I dug up from May of 2004:
bdoughty wrote:Gamespot article was updated late tonight. Both EA and Players Inc say the story was false. The cynic in me still thinks there were serious discussions and some type of deal struck, which lead to this information coming out by SBJ. Something pushed either the NFL or EA to back of, be it a legal issue, pressure by someone like ESPN or public opinion on such a deal.
Well I can always dream that is what happened.
While The Sports Business Journal broke the story, it was, ironically, reprinted in the magazine ESPN. This prompted a moderator at ESPNvideogames.com to call the NFLPA. According to the moderator, NFLPA reps denied that anything other than "normal" licensing deals were in play.
When contacted by GameSpot, NFLPA executives said that not only was the story false, but The Sports Business Journal has since run a retraction. EA representatives also later contacted GameSpot to confirm the retraction, a fact that will undoubtedly make fans of the ESPN NFL franchise breathe much easier.