Ah, the late, great Nick Charles. Missed him more than ever last night on the Showtime broadcast.XXXIV wrote:I love boxers. Your Nick Charles quote says it all. That is mostly what drives me nuts about decisions like those.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
Ah, the late, great Nick Charles. Missed him more than ever last night on the Showtime broadcast.XXXIV wrote:I love boxers. Your Nick Charles quote says it all. That is mostly what drives me nuts about decisions like those.
Trust me, I have talked about it quite a bit -- in the comments section of posts at the best boxing blog on the Web:Rodster wrote:I'm shocked PK has not mentioned the Mayweather vs Ortiz fight tomorrow night.
Irrelevant. Joe Cortez is too meddlesome and past his prime, but Ortiz has as much of a chance of victory with or without Cortez as the third man in the ring as Congress does of balancing the Federal budget by next Friday.Rodster wrote:So the ref favors PBF tactics, lovely
Pacquiao is completing his trilogy with Juan Manuel Marquez on Nov. 12. But this fight will be much more lopsided than the first two, which Marquez arguably won, because the fight is taking place at 147 instead of 126 and 130. Marquez is terrible at welterweight -- just look at his poor performance against Mayweather.Rodster wrote:Since no one talks boxing here I was listening to the video clip on ESPN. Teddy Atlas thinks Ortiz might have a shot if he's not to predictable much like Mosley when he caught PBF. Every one thinks it's PBF's fight to lose and boy would I love to see him lose.
Where's Manny?
Mayweather's KO combination was 100 percent legal. Maybe dubious ethically, but legal.Rodster wrote:Love the Ortiz head butt followed by the hit em when they ain't looking. What the hell was Ortiz doing looking over at the ref? I had no problem with PBF clocking Ortiz.
Diablo25 wrote:It was gutless. Legal? I guess, but gutless. You can see Mayweather sneak a peak at Cortez right before he throws the combo. Cortez needs to be handed his walking papers. Bullshit ending to the fight. Ortiz's headbutt was s*** too. I would demand my money back if I paid for the PPV. My opinion.
Well put. I'm not a Merchant guy either but I did like that he shot back at him.Jack-diggity wrote:Diablo25 wrote:It was gutless. Legal? I guess, but gutless. You can see Mayweather sneak a peak at Cortez right before he throws the combo. Cortez needs to be handed his walking papers. Bullshit ending to the fight. Ortiz's headbutt was s*** too. I would demand my money back if I paid for the PPV. My opinion.
Jim lampley said it best. Yes the shot was legal, but if Floyd really is better than Ray Robinson (as he frequently says) than he should not have to resort to such tactics to win. He would have put on a dominating performance which would silence critics and put pressure on Manny to take the fight/test. Mayweather doesn't have that in him. He's a hypocrite. Anyone that's watched a few of his fights knows he has no business crying about an attempted headbutt. He throws elbows like jabs. Floyd looked good in the four rounds, but Ortiz did have him sweating in a few spots. At the end of the day Floyd gets another win but loses fans in the process. I've never liked Mayweather. I can't pull for a man that beats women.
Cortez is a joke. Always has been. The fact he didn't make eye contact with these guys after all the s*** went down tells you all you need to know about the guy. This type of ending wouldn't have happened under a good referee's watch. Fighting fans miss ya Mills.
If you haven't seen this,enjoy. I don't agree with Larry Merchant 80% of the time. This falls in the 20% that I do.
Yeah if anyone gets the blame here is Cortez. The guy should have controlled the situation better. It got out of control and looked like a staged WWF wrestling match where the wrestler does something dirty while the ref is looking away.Jack-diggity wrote:Cortez is a joke. Always has been. The fact he didn't make eye contact with these guys after all the s*** went down tells you all you need to know about the guy. This type of ending wouldn't have happened under a good referee's watch. Fighting fans miss ya Mills.
Haven't watched any title bouts since the late 80s/early 90s but have caught the (very) occasional fights on ESPN weekday telecasts over the years. I stopped taking the sport seriously once PPV became so incredibly huge. To me it's a sham sport, which is a shame since at its base level it's one of the most basic sports on the planet. I used to watch boxing all the time as a kid on Wide World of Sports, HBO, Showtime, etc.toonarmy wrote:Not sure how anyone can take pro boxing seriously as a sport any more. In the 1970s and 1980s boxing was 70% sport and 30% spectacle. Now that ratio has been reversed. People who think the results of a significant number of boxing matches are not fixed and crooked are like the toothless morons you see at WWE matches thinking their favorite wrestler really is "gettin' dun wrong." And, yes, I realize there has always been crookedness to some degree in boxing, however it's a total infestation today. It's ashamed too, because pro boxing used to actually be compelling and fun to follow.
Explain to me how this fight was fixed or crooked. I'm all ears and eyes. You would have a point if Ortiz was winning, but he was not. So your point is just a continuation of one of the lazy arguments against boxing. I'm surprised you didn't toss a bouquet toward MMA -- then you would have hit the cliched "boxing is dead" daily double.toonarmy wrote:Not sure how anyone can take pro boxing seriously as a sport any more. In the 1970s and 1980s boxing was 70% sport and 30% spectacle. Now that ratio has been reversed. People who think the results of a significant number of boxing matches are not fixed and crooked are like the toothless morons you see at WWE matches thinking their favorite wrestler really is "gettin' dun wrong." And, yes, I realize there has always been crookedness to some degree in boxing, however it's a total infestation today. It's ashamed too, because pro boxing used to actually be compelling and fun to follow.
Anyone who has followed Floyd's career shouldn't be surprised by his tactics. He hit Judah on the break during their fight and used his elbows repeatedly to hit Hatton. The guy is a rough-and-tumble fighter in a rugged business.backbreaker wrote:Selective Memory going on in here. What do I mean? well when floyd fought Moseley, the same exact thing occurred on the break. The ref said fight Moseley had his hands by his side and floyd popped him, and he immediately put his hands up and started talking to floyd. So you see the headbutt had nothing to do with it, Moseley didn't protect himself and got popped the same for ortiz.
Let's see the ref said time in, Ortiz and floyd had tapped and hugged already. Its time to fight. Ortiz got popped and looked at the ref to save him instead of putting his hands up in a defensive posture.
Floyd was dominating the fight anyway, Ortiz flailing around getting credit for punches not landing. The fight was EASY WORK for floyd.
Calling the man a cheap shot artist and a sucker puncher, classless is crazy talk.
Yeah, refs have nothing to do with boxing matches. There is no defending what took place night -- none. Maybe the ref got distracted last night by the ghost of the Lovely Elizabeth.pk500 wrote:Explain to me how this fight was fixed or crooked. I'm all ears and eyes. You would have a point if Ortiz was winning, but he was not. So your point is just a continuation of one of the lazy arguments against boxing. I'm surprised you didn't toss a bouquet toward MMA -- then you would have hit the cliched "boxing is dead" daily double.toonarmy wrote:Not sure how anyone can take pro boxing seriously as a sport any more. In the 1970s and 1980s boxing was 70% sport and 30% spectacle. Now that ratio has been reversed. People who think the results of a significant number of boxing matches are not fixed and crooked are like the toothless morons you see at WWE matches thinking their favorite wrestler really is "gettin' dun wrong." And, yes, I realize there has always been crookedness to some degree in boxing, however it's a total infestation today. It's ashamed too, because pro boxing used to actually be compelling and fun to follow.
The result of this fight was due to questionable ethics by Mayweather and gross ineptitude by Cortez, not by any sort of fix.
If you knew anything about the recent trend of fights officiated by Joe Cortez, you would know that his ineptitude has become about as ubiquitous as blood droplets on the canvas. Cortez also is 66 years old, far too old to officiate such major bouts.toonarmy wrote:Yeah, refs have nothing to do with boxing matches. There is no defending what took place night -- none. Maybe the ref got distracted last night by the ghost of the Lovely Elizabeth.