Must you remind me of Clouts that year? Oh yeah, we had a good solid 2-0 lead going into the playoffs against Detroit when N. Lidstrom shoots from center ice and the puck eludes Cloutier's glove. Goal, game, series.pk500 wrote:A bit of a difference. Those teams locked up proven superstars to those long-term deals in the era of cap-o-nomics. There's a difference between proven commodities like Richards, Ovechkin and Zetterberg, and DiPietro.Naples39 wrote:I'm not about to heap praise on the guy, but it is worth mentioning that Wang's brainchild megadeals have since been copied by the Flyers, Capitals and Red Wings.pk500 wrote:1. Signed Alexei Yashin to a 10-year contract. Boy, that worked out well.
2. Signed Rick DiPietro to a 15-year contract. That's a lovely albatross for any franchise to carry.
Richards probably is the closest analogy because he played only two seasons before his mega-deal, but both were solid. The numbers were down in year two, but he also missed part of that season after surgery.
Yashin's deal was signed before the cap, which was stupid. DiPietro had ONE strong season for the Isles -- 2.36, .911, 5 SO -- in 2003-04, the year before the lockout. It was lunacy to sign a guy to a 15-year deal based on one good year.
And remember, Rocky put up those numbers in the last year of the dead puck, clutch-and-grab era. While those numbers would be eye-poppers now, they weren't THAT special in 2003-04. DiPietro's GAA ranked 14th among NHL goalies who played at least 40 games that season, and his save percentage was 17th overall by the same measuring stick.
A bit of perspective: Dan Cloutier had better numbers that season that DiPietro. Dan F*cking Cloutier!
The Yashin and DiPietro deals were just a case of Charlie touching his erect wang and trying to be the NHL's contrarian, at the expense of both his franchise and its long-suffering fans.
Take care,
PK
In general I really think that contracts shouldn't go past 5 years. No matter who you're, it's too risky, it's not cap friendly and you're putting your team in jeopardy when you need to rebuild. Take the recent example of DET. One of the brightest GM in the business just signed the Mule Franzen for what; 11 years? The contract is cap friendly when you read the numbers in general and it averages to about 5-6 million. Money well deserved for a guy like Franzen, but do you really think this guys can play up to the age 40? In today's NHL?
He's just had some back issues also this season, not so sure what Holland was thinking on this one.
On the Tavares issue, I have nothing against the Isles, I just want a team that will surround him with quality players, make sure to the fans that the team is staying put and show some seriousness to the fans. This NYI team has been a laughing stock for awhile now, and thank goodness they got rid of M. Milbury a few years back.