The official MLB 2K6 sucks thread....

Welcome to the Digital Sportspage forum.

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady

User avatar
Leebo33
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 6592
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: PA

Post by Leebo33 »

I'll probably be buying it at Best Buy unless the early reviews/impressions are horrible. I can live with imperfection or lack of polish (think Madden 360), but there is no way I can live with something similar to the bug-ridden crapfest they tried to pass off as videogame baseball last year.
User avatar
Dave
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:00 am

Post by Dave »

Rented the XBox version.

Quick impressions:

The music blows
Joe Morgan is dumber in this game than when he is talking about Moneyball
Everyone loses their helmet running to first
xbl/psn tag: dave2eleven
Inuyasha
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4638
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 3:00 am

Post by Inuyasha »

When does the MLB exclusive license run out with 2k? It was only a 2 year deal right?
User avatar
matthewk
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3324
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by matthewk »

Inuyasha wrote:When does the MLB exclusive license run out with 2k? It was only a 2 year deal right?
I thought it was 7.

Edit: I just checked, and it is for 7 years.
-Matt
User avatar
Dave
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:00 am

Post by Dave »

Well, I made the mistake of picking up MVP 05 for $10 while I was out...let's just say I only managed to take one game of MLB 2k6.

I should probably give 2k6 more time, but I think the cameras stink, the music sucks, the graphics look worse than MVP, the fielding isn't as good, and it just doesn't feel as fun to me.

I did forget how good MVP was, though.
xbl/psn tag: dave2eleven
User avatar
GTHobbes
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 2873
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 4:00 am

Post by GTHobbes »

I haven't played this year's XBox version, but what's the deal with the cameras in Kush's game? It's like Tiburon with Madden, where they don't even seem to try to give you what you see on a TV broadcast. The fielding camera in Kush's baseball game is as strange a choice as I can remember seeing in a sports videogame. I still wish they'd turn this series back over to WoW. I know a lot of people didn't like WSB2k1 for the DC (I thought it was a year away from being a great game), but a lot of people did seem to like HR Kings, which really was WSB2k2 in my mind.

No offense to Fat Pitcher if he's still around, but the series started downhill when WoW stopped developing it, IMO, and it started to snowball whenever Kush took over the reins. Hopefully the 360 version proves me wrong and turns out to be a great game, but I'm not holding my breath.
User avatar
Boltman
Starting 5
Starting 5
Posts: 788
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:00 am
Location: "The Mission City" San Fer, CA.

Post by Boltman »

GTHobbes wrote:I haven't played this year's XBox version, but what's the deal with the cameras in Kush's game? It's like Tiburon with Madden, where they don't even seem to try to give you what you see on a TV broadcast. The fielding camera in Kush's baseball game is as strange a choice as I can remember seeing in a sports videogame. I still wish they'd turn this series back over to WoW. I know a lot of people didn't like WSB2k1 for the DC (I thought it was a year away from being a great game), but a lot of people did seem to like HR Kings, which really was WSB2k2 in my mind.

No offense to Fat Pitcher if he's still around, but the series started downhill when WoW stopped developing it, IMO, and it started to snowball whenever Kush took over the reins. Hopefully the 360 version proves me wrong and turns out to be a great game, but I'm not holding my breath.
Kush just flat out sucks to me. They do one hit wonders out of their ass from time to time ie: Top spin, NBA. But them and making baseball games does not add up.

I played the crap out of MVP last year (never got into college ball this year), and my buddy was a staunch 2K5 guy. I admit this year he had me playing 2K5 alot with him. I liked the way the players looked a bit more realistic to me than MVP's.

My buddy bought 2K6 two days ago, said it was ten times worse than 2K5, he now has to get rid of it. He is out to find another 2K5 again. The veiwing angles are garbage. The announcers spew all types of random crap. Rosters a joke as well. It truely looks they bailed out mid developement, and jumped onto developing their 360 effort.

Since EA cannot make a great MLB MVP no longer, I too like DB, Guru, and you others will be getting their 360 effort and praying for a good showing.


2K6 on X Box is simply unplayable.
User avatar
Dave
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 3553
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:00 am

Post by Dave »

Boltman wrote:The veiwing angles are garbage. The announcers spew all types of random crap. Rosters a joke as well. It truely looks they bailed out mid developement, and jumped onto developing their 360 effort.
That about says it all. Hopefully, for those with a 360, they did bail out on this version (in about Jan or Feb by the looks of the roster) and concentrate on putting a truly next-gen engine together, one that will power the franchise through the end of their exclusive contract.

As I've seen others state--MS, do something with that High Heat engine you bought.
xbl/psn tag: dave2eleven
User avatar
dbdynsty25
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 21616
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Post by dbdynsty25 »

Dave wrote:Well, I made the mistake of picking up MVP 05 for $10 while I was out...let's just say I only managed to take one game of MLB 2k6.
That wasn't a mistake...that was covering your ass. Good call.
User avatar
NoJoke
Benchwarmer
Benchwarmer
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 3:00 am

Post by NoJoke »

dbdynsty25 wrote:
Dave wrote:Well, I made the mistake of picking up MVP 05 for $10 while I was out...let's just say I only managed to take one game of MLB 2k6.
That wasn't a mistake...that was covering your ass. Good call.
I'd agree with that. Get the PC version, and you'll get an evolving game on a promising engine.
User avatar
dbdynsty25
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 21616
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Post by dbdynsty25 »

I still can't get the PC version to play correctly on there. The engine just doesn't like my PC setup I guess. I've NEVER been able to completely play MVP smoothly...any other game...piece of cake. Weird. MVP on the Xbox is sufficient enough with the updated rosters.
User avatar
FatPitcher
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 3:00 am

Post by FatPitcher »

I approve of this thread.
User avatar
laurenskye
Starting 5
Starting 5
Posts: 786
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Muskegon, MI

Post by laurenskye »

Oooh, that's gotta hurt.

Is there any indication that the 360 version is any good? I've seen all the vids and what not but does anyone "in the know" have any thing to give us hope?
User avatar
dbdynsty25
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 21616
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Post by dbdynsty25 »

The only game that has been night and day better on the 360 in a multi-platform release has been GRAW...so that's about all the hope we've got right now. Everything else has been virtually the same (minus the better visuals).
User avatar
Sudz
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by Sudz »

FatPitcher wrote:I approve of this thread.
explain
User avatar
dbdynsty25
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 21616
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA

Post by dbdynsty25 »

Sudz wrote:
FatPitcher wrote:I approve of this thread.
explain
Uhh...the game sucks. What more do you need to know?
User avatar
Zeppo
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 7517
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 3:00 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by Zeppo »

Sudz wrote:
FatPitcher wrote:I approve of this thread.
explain
I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I believe he used to work for either Kush, or the dev. that used to do the 2k baseball before Kush, or something like that. Bottom line, he used to be involved in the coding of 2k baseball and has seen the madness from the inside with frustration and building anger. . . .
User avatar
FatPitcher
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 3:00 am

Post by FatPitcher »

I did a lot of the design on WSB, WSB2K3, and ESPN MLB.

Basically, VC destroyed 2K4 with some brain-dead executive decisions. We wanted to focus on AI, batting animations, franchise mode, and overall polish and refinement. They wanted to copy whatever EA did the year before, to put out a demo, and to add gimmicks like First Person Baseball for the back of the box. The few redeeming features of 2K4 were things that we did basically on our own time.

While they were doing this, they also were secretly talking to Kush about giving them the development contract.

So I am not sad to see Kush screwing up, although I'd like a good next-gen baseball game to play.
Inuyasha
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4638
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 3:00 am

Post by Inuyasha »

The WSB Series , especially 2k3 and 2k4 were the best baseball games out at those times. I hated cursor hitting but 2k3 was that good that cursor hitting didn't matter. 2k4 had a boring atmosphere but the solid gameplay made it fun to play.

I remember MVP was pretty young at those times and was more on the arcade side and had a lot of bugs. EA was smart enough to stick with it and made the excellent mvp2005. Too bad VC couldn't stick with 2k3/2k4 . Think of what could have been if the 2k was left to evovle after 2k4.
User avatar
Sudz
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by Sudz »

FatPitcher wrote:I did a lot of the design on WSB, WSB2K3, and ESPN MLB.

Basically, VC destroyed 2K4 with some brain-dead executive decisions. We wanted to focus on AI, batting animations, franchise mode, and overall polish and refinement. They wanted to copy whatever EA did the year before, to put out a demo, and to add gimmicks like First Person Baseball for the back of the box. The few redeeming features of 2K4 were things that we did basically on our own time.

While they were doing this, they also were secretly talking to Kush about giving them the development contract.

So I am not sad to see Kush screwing up, although I'd like a good next-gen baseball game to play.
what are u working on now?
User avatar
FatPitcher
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 3:00 am

Post by FatPitcher »

Sudz wrote:
what are u working on now?
I started a game design consulting company and have about 10 different projects that I'm involved with. No sports games, though.
User avatar
TRI
Benchwarmer
Benchwarmer
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:00 am

Post by TRI »

MLB 2K4 was the best 2K baseball game and it is very unfortunate that MLB 2K5 and MLB 2K6 are much inferior. I think they are trying to do too much with the game. All they had to do was tweak MLB 2K4 and improve the animations.
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

totally agree. 2K4 showed so much promise, but it all seemed to
go backwards from that point

TRI wrote:MLB 2K4 was the best 2K baseball game and it is very unfortunate that MLB 2K5 and MLB 2K6 are much inferior. I think they are trying to do too much with the game. All they had to do was tweak MLB 2K4 and improve the animations.
User avatar
Gurantsu
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 2126
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:00 am
Location: York, PA

Post by Gurantsu »

I got the disembodied female robot voice message from EB last night, saying that MLB 2K6 for the 360 will be in today. Earlier than I expected, but at least we'll see how they did on it soon.

I have my fingers crossed!
2319!

Gamertag: "Gurantsu"
User avatar
JackB1
DSP-Funk All-Star
DSP-Funk All-Star
Posts: 8124
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:00 am

Post by JackB1 »

I finally played thru a few games last night and I really don't think this game is bad at all. As good as MVP or The Show? Maybe not. But it is definitley better than 2K5 and that game didn't get such abuse. I think a lot of people quickly dismissed the game without really giving it a chance and "learning" the nuances of the new controls. There are so many sliders and the game is so tweakable, lots of the problems can be somewhat fixed. The pitching system is brilliant. I love how the catcher can be moved around and will also call pitches and suggest locations for players you have scouted. The hitting takes a little getting used to after NCAA. I have to remember to not let go of the stick when I dont want to swing! I does seem a little easy to make contact if you just time it right, but NCAA is the same way. Sliders may help this. I would like to strike out more often. The much maligned momentum based fielding system is actually pretty cool once you "understand" how it works and learn the best ways to change directions and how to control your fielders. The graphics and overall look of the game is almost identical to last year, but the game looks real sweet in HD on a HD TV. The biggest flaws I can see are occasional baserunning flaws by the AI, but nothing too crazy.

Again, this is only after a few games, but I really dont think this game is that bad and all the reviews tend to agree with me. It is getting around 80%'s or 8 out of 10's from most review sites, which I think is about right. The game really has a lot of nice innovations in it and if they tighten up the AI, this game could be solid.
Post Reply