XXXIV wrote:anchester wrote:hey boom, well said. Glad to know there are others out there that can give my initial post a fair assessment without resorting to the typical insults and sarcasm.
The man copied a 500,000 word essay on the improvements.
He wasted his time.
You cannot make a blind man see.
You also can't make a blind man realize that it was his "only a roster update remark" that lead to the typical "insults and arguments".
All the features, presentation, and "fluff" in the world won't matter to me if the game still plays the same on the field.
I think EA trademarked the word "fluff".... I could have sworn I saw it om the back of TW 2004 for the Xbox.
So let's all do our part and be sure to give Registered Trademark credit here at DSP...
Fluff ™ Electronic Arts
Whoops sorry about the bold type set
bd,
you can quote all of the IGN impressions etc that you want, but haven't we learned from MVP that it really doesn't mean a damn thing? They did the same thing for a full month prior to its release (MVP) with WOW'ing us with all of the great things this game had to offer. We know the general consensus of that game around here.
Funny I recall OS and many other sites doing the same thing with MVP Baseball. MVP 2004 is my favorite baseball game of the bunch. It does not matter to me what the "general consensus" thinks is the best. The "general consensus" does not control my purse strings or enjoyment value. Very few people have NCAA 2005, Madden 2005 and ESPN 2K5. I thought I would quote a source that had more then videos.
You will buy only EA games again this year... ESPN and Sega are the devil.
You will buy only EA games again this year... ESPN and Sega are the devil.
You will buy only EA games again this year... ESPN and Sega are the devil.
Cute sheep, I think I will name him "General Consensus". Or maybe even go with
Fluff ™ Electronic Arts.