I was at the game, too.Feanor wrote:http://www.nhl.com/hockeyu/rulebook/rule18.html
It was obvious that Thoresen had sustained a serious injury but since the NHL used the word "may" instead of "shall", the refs can do whatever they want. If that was Ovechkin down on the ice in agony, I think the whistle blows immediately.When a player is injured so that he cannot continue play or go to his bench, the play shall not be stopped until the injured player's Team has secured possession of the puck; if the player's Team is in possession of the puck at the time of injury, play shall be stopped immediately unless his Team is in a scoring position.
(NOTE) In the case where it is obvious that a player has sustained a serious injury, the Referee and/or Linesman may stop the play immediately.
Thoresen's lucky that the Caps scored pretty quickly after his injury. They could have been passing the puck around for another minute or more while he was down hurt. Actually, the NHL is pretty lucky, too.
I can agree on all points. My guess on the "obvious" is a visible cue of blood, broken leg, etc...Volchenkov of Ottawa was in a similar predicament in their game 1 and it took a great save by Gerber to stop a goal then, too.
Also, Brad Watson was the ref. He's garbage.