It's going to be a slow summer

Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
LOL"Is it going to cost me in endorsements? Whoop-de-doo. I never had any endorsements, anyways. I don't base my life on that. I go to work like every other American."
I don't know, they suddenly have problems scoring runs of all things. And they have a better staff now, but outside of Cook (kind of) and Kim, their starters are unreliable. Jennings is Jennings, and Francis somehow led the staff in wins despite being terrible 75% of the time. His having 14 wins with an ERA+ of 83 was one of the weirdest stats of last year.fatheadX wrote:You heard it here first: the under-the-radar 2006 Colorado Rockies will finish 80-82 this year! They have lots of young talent and many question marks, but the trend it upward.
Hey snaz, I'm curious about your thoughts on the Coco Crisp deal. I was really surprised how Shapiro got raked over the coals by both the fans and the media around here when news of that deal started breaking.snaz16 wrote:Ohh my Central Division foes..how soon you forget the Cleveland Indians![]()
I haven't felt this bad going into a season since Don Baylor was wearing lettuce under his Cubs cap. Pierre was a good acquisition and I liked their bullpen additions, but I'm still scratching my head at replacing Corey Patterson with an older, more expensive version of Corey Patterson in right. If they wanted strikeouts and power, why not keep Burnitz?RobVarak wrote:As usual, the Cubs will go as far as Prior and Zambrano can take them. Adding Pierre was nice, but Dusty-approved veteran barnacles like Marquis Grissom and Jacque Jones will help make sure that I have plenty of reason to scream at the TV all summer.
On the bright side, only a couple weeks until my annual Spring Training pilgramage. Watch for me on the news, as I'm considering civil disobedience in the form of an arrest stemming from my hurling copies of Baseball for Dummies at Dusty during a pitching change.
Does Burnitz continually hit into double plays and smile, though? Ahh...no Jacque Jones for me this year.Brando70 wrote:I'm still scratching my head at replacing Corey Patterson with an older, more expensive version of Corey Patterson in right. If they wanted strikeouts and power, why not keep Burnitz?
Will Carroll at BP:AJColossal wrote:I know a lot of Cubs fans sound pessimistic here, but I'm not. Part of this might be insanity, but I'm looking forward to this season.
I think a big part of this is that Prior will be healthy. He's had a TON of freak injuries the past few years, and I think he's just due for some good luck. A full year of a healthy Prior will make a big difference.
I believe you take this story with a grain of salt. This guy is just trying to get some hits on his website and sell subscriptions. Baseball Prospectus is a pay website. And they also have an annual book coming out soon that he is trying to push. I listened to this guy yesterday on the Score with Boers & Bernstein and he was saying his sources were stating Prior had shoulder problems for sure, and then after the Cubs, (Hendry and Prior) were disputing the story and saying there was nothing to it, the same guy was on Sports Central with Dave kaplan and Tom Waddell later in the evening saying that his sources were saying it was a A"possible" injury. This guy was backpedaling big time last night.RobVarak wrote:Will Carroll at BP:AJColossal wrote:I know a lot of Cubs fans sound pessimistic here, but I'm not. Part of this might be insanity, but I'm looking forward to this season.
I think a big part of this is that Prior will be healthy. He's had a TON of freak injuries the past few years, and I think he's just due for some good luck. A full year of a healthy Prior will make a big difference.
You can't have spring training anymore without pitcher problems or at least rumors of said problems. Those usually start with the Cubs, and this year is no different. Reliable sources--the same ones that tipped us early to Mark Prior's Achilles problem--now tell us that Prior is having shoulder problems. The Cubs deny this and point to Prior's work on the mound. Prior was doing towel drills on Saturday, but this is the same type of work he was doing last year when there was a problem. According to our best sources in Mesa, Prior looks "weak and sick." Until he throws, we just won't know, though I'd like to believe Larry Rothschild.
Lex....You pretty much summed up my feelings on the trade,and Shapiro.To do what he's done in 3 years,recognize the talent and reel it in,i.e. Sizemore,Hafner,Lee,Crisp,etc. has been nothing short of impressive. Is Marte a risk? What trade for a prospect isn't. But considering Marte is the top ranked 3rd base prospect in baseball,been named the top rated defensive player at that position, the last few years,and put up impressive numbers at AAA at the age of 21 when most of his peers at that level are 3 to 4 years older. With Boone at 3rd,there is no rush,although most observers feel he is ready now. I don't put too much stock in last years call up,there have been many who have stumbled on thier 1st cup of coffee. The Tribe haslexbur wrote:Hey snaz, I'm curious about your thoughts on the Coco Crisp deal. I was really surprised how Shapiro got raked over the coals by both the fans and the media around here when news of that deal started breaking.snaz16 wrote:Ohh my Central Division foes..how soon you forget the Cleveland Indians![]()
I don't get it, what's a guy gotta do? Back during the big fire sale a few years ago he promised we'd be contending again by '05, and he delivered. Not only that, he was MLB's Executive of the Year. Yet all winter people have done nothing but b*tch about him and Dolan, not signing any "big name" FA's while the White Sox are busy doing their Baltimore Orioles impersonation, throwing money everywhere, and then the whole Crisp deal.
The way people were squealing about giving up Crisp, you'd thought we were trading away Tris Speaker or something. Heck, last year at this time those same people were b*tching Coco was even was in our projected Opening Day lineup.
I may be a lemming, but I'm giving Shapiro the benefit of the doubt all the way this offseason. If he says it was a poor FA class this winter, hardly any of them worth what they were asking (except for Hoffman, he wanted him bad), and if he says we can't pass up an opportunity to get Marte, who am I to question it?
BTW, looking down the road a little, a lineup that's got Marte, Peralta, Martinez and Garko in it? Are you kidding me? They'll make those lineups of the '90s look like lightweights. Especially since that's just the infield!!!
In case you're wondering, Marte has been up before (in '04)...last year he was up multiple times. Sometimes you just gotta cut your losses. Schuerholz has messed up on one prospect in the last 15 years...Jason Schmidt. That should help your confidence in Marte.snaz16 wrote:I don't put too much stock in last years call up,there have been many who have stumbled on thier 1st cup of coffee.
According to baseball reference,Marte made his debut last year:dbdynsty25 wrote:In case you're wondering, Marte has been up before (in '04)...last year he was up multiple times. Sometimes you just gotta cut your losses. Schuerholz has messed up on one prospect in the last 15 years...Jason Schmidt. That should help your confidence in Marte.snaz16 wrote:I don't put too much stock in last years call up,there have been many who have stumbled on thier 1st cup of coffee.
This is also the same author who said in 2003 that a deal had been reached to reinstate Pete Rose to baseball.RobVarak wrote:Will Carroll at BP:AJColossal wrote:I know a lot of Cubs fans sound pessimistic here, but I'm not. Part of this might be insanity, but I'm looking forward to this season.
I think a big part of this is that Prior will be healthy. He's had a TON of freak injuries the past few years, and I think he's just due for some good luck. A full year of a healthy Prior will make a big difference.
You can't have spring training anymore without pitcher problems or at least rumors of said problems. Those usually start with the Cubs, and this year is no different. Reliable sources--the same ones that tipped us early to Mark Prior's Achilles problem--now tell us that Prior is having shoulder problems. The Cubs deny this and point to Prior's work on the mound. Prior was doing towel drills on Saturday, but this is the same type of work he was doing last year when there was a problem. According to our best sources in Mesa, Prior looks "weak and sick." Until he throws, we just won't know, though I'd like to believe Larry Rothschild.
Many media sources are reporting that Prior is having his shoulder looked at, after reporting pain and stiffness.AJColossal wrote:This is also the same author who said in 2003 that a deal had been reached to reinstate Pete Rose to baseball.RobVarak wrote:Will Carroll at BP:AJColossal wrote:I know a lot of Cubs fans sound pessimistic here, but I'm not. Part of this might be insanity, but I'm looking forward to this season.
I think a big part of this is that Prior will be healthy. He's had a TON of freak injuries the past few years, and I think he's just due for some good luck. A full year of a healthy Prior will make a big difference.
You can't have spring training anymore without pitcher problems or at least rumors of said problems. Those usually start with the Cubs, and this year is no different. Reliable sources--the same ones that tipped us early to Mark Prior's Achilles problem--now tell us that Prior is having shoulder problems. The Cubs deny this and point to Prior's work on the mound. Prior was doing towel drills on Saturday, but this is the same type of work he was doing last year when there was a problem. According to our best sources in Mesa, Prior looks "weak and sick." Until he throws, we just won't know, though I'd like to believe Larry Rothschild.
I'm not saying that Prior is 100% healthy, because how would I know? All I'm saying is don't believe everything you hear, especially from a source with a history of questionable reporting.
They shoulda cashed out Prior for Tejada if that deal was indeed on the table. Prior will always be a 150 inning pitcher with Dusty around. Only Zambrano seems impervious to Dusty abuse, which probably makes him the toughest pitcher in the game physically.AJColossal wrote:Many media sources are reporting that Prior is having his shoulder looked at, after reporting pain and stiffness.AJColossal wrote:This is also the same author who said in 2003 that a deal had been reached to reinstate Pete Rose to baseball.RobVarak wrote: Will Carroll at BP:
You can't have spring training anymore without pitcher problems or at least rumors of said problems. Those usually start with the Cubs, and this year is no different. Reliable sources--the same ones that tipped us early to Mark Prior's Achilles problem--now tell us that Prior is having shoulder problems. The Cubs deny this and point to Prior's work on the mound. Prior was doing towel drills on Saturday, but this is the same type of work he was doing last year when there was a problem. According to our best sources in Mesa, Prior looks "weak and sick." Until he throws, we just won't know, though I'd like to believe Larry Rothschild.
I'm not saying that Prior is 100% healthy, because how would I know? All I'm saying is don't believe everything you hear, especially from a source with a history of questionable reporting.
So I guess the moral of the story is actually this: when it comes to Prior and Wood, believe ANYONE but Cubs management, until it is proven otherwise.
I know we don't have any luck whatsoever, but sometimes it boggles the mind.