

"Bernie Ecclestone would like to see trackside sprinklers at Formula One circuits to artificially create the excitement of a wet circuit midway through grands prix."
http://en.espnf1.com/f1/motorsport/story/42110.html
Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
At this point I think Bernie is trying to think of the dumbest things to say just to get his kicks seeing how people respond. I'm really sure he's prepared to fund sprinkler systems on these long tracks just to make for 20 mins of wet racing, not to mention the horrible press he'd get when the first car wrecks under artificial wet conditions. Of course if this cockamamie idea ever did come to fruition everyone would be accusing Ferrari of knowing in advance of the two-minute warning period when the sprinklers would be set off, and in which direction the water would be flowing.Rodster wrote:Ecclestone keen to 'make' it rain during races
![]()
"Bernie Ecclestone would like to see trackside sprinklers at Formula One circuits to artificially create the excitement of a wet circuit midway through grands prix."
http://en.espnf1.com/f1/motorsport/story/42110.html
Recall the 2005 United States Grand Prix at Indianapolis, during which Bernie said Danica Patrick -- just weeks after her sizzling debut at the Indy 500 -- should be at home wearing an apron and tending to kitchen appliances. Stevie Wonder could see deep down Bernard Charles would LOVE to have a competitive female in F1.GB_Simo wrote:Bernie has always said things with his tongue wedged so firmly into his cheek that he's about to break the skin. News agencies have always reported these things as fact, people have always believed them, Bernard Charles has not meant them. Here is a particularly fine example. Keeps people talking, doesn't it?
I think Al Jr. could have been excellent in F1. He won Long Beach a record six times in CART. 'Nuff said.GB_Simo wrote:The only man to comment on that Roebuck link makes brief mention of Michael Andretti's 1993 season and wonders how Little Al would have gone. I seem to recall he had a Williams test in which the team found him disappointing, but Bobby Unser had a couple of BRM entries in 1968 which, like Foyt, he didn't start the race with. Did us European types miss anything there? He did qualify it at Monza, not all that rapidly though it should be said that the car was a dog of the highest pedigree, but didn't do enough F1 running to make any kind of judgement.
Then again, perhaps he'd have gone somewhat faster and been somewhat fitter had he ever been genuinely interested in doing it.If Michael Andretti's season in F1 undoubtedly affected European team owners' opinions of American drivers, so also - albeit less overtly - did Al Unser Jr's test with Williams at Estoril in '91. Again, at the time Al was regarded as one of the real hotshoes in CART, but his run in the Williams was described by one team member as, "Embarrassing, to be honest. For a start, he clearly wasn't anything like fit enough. After a few laps in the car, he could hardly move his head." And were his times slow? I asked. "Not as quick as that..." came the answer.
F1 fitness would have been a problem for Al. He was a chain smoker and hard drinker. He is sober now, and I think he kicked the cancer stick habit recently.GB_Simo wrote:Then again, perhaps he'd have gone somewhat faster and been somewhat fitter had he ever been genuinely interested in doing it.
Great to hear that about Al, he had some rough years.pk500 wrote:F1 fitness would have been a problem for Al. He was a chain smoker and hard drinker. He is sober now, and I think he kicked the cancer stick habit recently.
True enough, mate, and it's good to know he's given those vices the heave-ho. I was thinking more that his fitness for that test might have suggested the desire to follow it up was never really there and that it'd be a shame if it had any great impact on F1's view of American racers at the time - the impression we have over here is that Little Al was very much in love with IndyCar and the 500.pk500 wrote:F1 fitness would have been a problem for Al. He was a chain smoker and hard drinker. He is sober now, and I think he kicked the cancer stick habit recently.GB_Simo wrote:Then again, perhaps he'd have gone somewhat faster and been somewhat fitter had he ever been genuinely interested in doing it.
A very accurate impression, indeed. I don't think Al or Rick Mears were that interested in F1.GB_Simo wrote:the impression we have over here is that Little Al was very much in love with IndyCar and the 500.
I'm not sure how to respond to this without sounding like an arrogant jerk, so maybe I'll come off as an arrogant jerk! The "long" build-up leading to Race Day of the Indianapolis 500 is part of the 100-year tradition of the race. If you think it's long now, the track used to open May 1 for a month of practice before the race!F308GTB wrote:Paul, why is there no Indy Car race at the Indy road course? Coworker and I were talking today, and no offense to the spectacle of the Indy 500, but the 2 week process of practice, qualification, and race is just too long. Wouldn't it be cool to sandwich an extra race in there on the road course? Start the first weekend with the road race, practice through the week, qualify for the 500 the weekend before, battle it out for 200 laps the next weekend. Has it ever been considered? As it is there's a 4 week break from one race to the next.
How about the weird growth on the nose of the McLaren?Rodster wrote:Man I can't get over how huge the current F1 car looks with the larger fuel tank. It's a small picture but it shows the proportionate size of the car.
A measuring device designed to check Idon'tknowwhat. I'm not sure I've ever seen a measuring device designed into the front end packaging like that...Dave wrote:How about the weird growth on the nose of the McLaren?Rodster wrote:Man I can't get over how huge the current F1 car looks with the larger fuel tank. It's a small picture but it shows the proportionate size of the car.
I thought of you as soon as I read the Villeneuve piece, mate. As far as Petter goes, it's a good point. Autosport seem convinced that Bernard wants a rally driver in there, reporting that Loeb has ruled it out while Block's schedule wouldn't allow it (by which I assume they mean he's not scheduled to have an enormous accident anywhere in Nevada that weekend). From there, you're only left with Kimi and, while he'd probably be better box office, I'm not sure he'd give enough of a toss to do it.pk500 wrote:I would like to see Petter because he's my favorite WRC driver. But Randy Bernard wants to "move the needle," and I don't think Petter will do that with North American fans.
JV would be a fine addition to the field just so I could take special glee when he gets his ass kicked. Villeneuve almost makes Paul Tracy seem relevant, fresh and vital.
Live on ESPN3.com Saturday. Tape-delay 12:30 p.m. (ET) Sunday, ABC.Gurantsu wrote:Am I just not looking hard enough or is Sebring not on TV this weekend?