sf_z wrote:http://www.sportsreviewers.com
Sigh I just had to click that link.
Moderators: Bill_Abner, ScoopBrady
sf_z wrote:http://www.sportsreviewers.com
Whew! I hadn't been on since 3/26.reeche wrote:What's more fun is to go to the old ianstorm forums and click and see who's visited that sight recently by clicking on their username. There is a LAST ON category that tracks when you last visited the sight (not when you last posted). It's pretty interesting to see who still kind of haunts around that place and who doesn't and when they stopped. (Not a knock against people who do. I only really noticed it because I do and was curious who else does)
Outspoken, egomaniacal, going against the conventional wisdom, slaying the holy cows which need to be slain.sf_z wrote:http://www.sportsreviewers.com
wco81 wrote:Outspoken, egomaniacal, going against the conventional wisdom, slaying the holy cows which need to be slain.sf_z wrote:http://www.sportsreviewers.com
The spirit of SR lives on.
Scoop, it's:ScoopBrady wrote:Leebo,
Mind checking the last time I was there. I don't even have it bookmarked anymore so I have no idea how to access it.
Scoop: 4/14/04Brando70 wrote:Scoop, it's:ScoopBrady wrote:Leebo,
Mind checking the last time I was there. I don't even have it bookmarked anymore so I have no idea how to access it.
http://www.ianstorm.com/forums/periscop ... p?Do=frm74
Haven't really checked it out in the last couple months. I would have looked you up but you can't search, so I have no idea when your last visit would have been.
It sure does take a lot of bullsh*t to slay a holy cowwco81 wrote:slaying the holy cows which need to be slain.sf_z wrote:http://www.sportsreviewers.com
But Clinton lying under oath to a grand jury was cool? I just want to administer a bit of a partisanship litmus test here.wco81 wrote:You mean like the fact that Reagan had Nicaragua's harbors mined, a nation which we were not officially at war with, was bulls***? Yeah it was a bulls*** move alright.
Clinton blew up an aspiran factory, dude. We were not "at war" then either. We also wasn't at war when Sudan offered him Bin Laden on a silver platter and he turned the offer down.You mean like the fact that Reagan had Nicaragua's harbors mined, a nation which we were not officially at war with, was bulls***? Yeah it was a bulls*** move alright.
The thing is that there are many many web sites out there that outline the foreign policy failures of Clinton that did cause death and misery for other people. I'm not going to bother outlining it here because it seems pointless and I don't even know if the facts are straight. I'm just saying there are many pages with negative propoganda on Clinton that read just like Sybil's page on Reagan. I guess it just matters what you want to believe.wco81 wrote:But Clinton's sordid behavior didn't lead to deaths or misery for other people.
Well, Clinton's lack of foreign policy in Africa led to deaths of American troops in Somalia, but that's for another day. And it's daft to blame only Bush for the intel breakdowns that led to 9/11, as some of those blunders took place under Clinton's watch, too. They continued during the Bush Jr. administration, too.wco81 wrote:Where did I say that anything Clinton did with respect to the Zippergate scandal was "cool"?
I didn't think it was a hanging or impeachable offense nor did most Americans at the time.
Clinton will have to confront the shame he brought on himself, his family and the office of the presidency in the judgement of later generations. The scandal justly will overshadow some of the positive things which occurred during his presidency. That is probably why he was so desperate to broker a Mideast peace agreement as his presidency wound down.
But Clinton's sordid behavior didn't lead to deaths or misery for other people.
World Trade Center was first bombed in 1993. Clinton was offered Bin Laden via Sudan and he declined.Clinton wasn't dealt 9.11 or the Cold War and that reflects his foriegn policy stance.
18% interest rates, double digit inflation, 8% unemployment. A monkey would have beaten CarterIf Carter didn't have the hostage situation he might have been elected to a 2nd term.