pk500 wrote:Those streaming boxes don't give me the options to play games with friends when I want. I said my gaming time has declined -- not ended.
Sure, if you were going to migrate with XBL all along, it didn't matter that much what they did with streaming and other video content. At a minimum, they could have kept things the same way they are now with X360.
But they're making this TV integration a key part of the feature set, because I think they rightly suspect that gaming alone won't sell, probably not even at the same rate as the current generation, because of the success of mobile devices as alternative electronic toys.
So there are some wild numbers being thrown about, like MS itself says 100 million units could be possible for Xbone. Some others are talking hundreds of millions, because they see how well phones and tablets are selling, so why shouldn't some do-everything box controlling your TV have similar success?
Basically they seem to be trying to lure the casual or non-gamers the way the Wii successfully lured them, to break out of the gaming console ghetto. If you're going to subscribe to XBL anyways because you'd be gaming enough, then these TV features are a nice bonus (assuming you get all the gaming and TV features with the same subscription). But if you're not a heavy gamer but intrigued by the TV features, then the idea of paying for a next-gen console and then paying some subscription on top to use those features is pretty hard to justify.
The negative for gamers may be the way they handle used games. Could mean you can't rent games nor even borrow them, without paying some fee, in addition to making it harder to sell games after you're done with them. But there's suspicion that Sony would impose some similar scheme, because the developers and publishers really want to get a piece of the used games pie.